I just don't get why people can't accept that a punk-ass loser killed JFK

[sendero]

9. Because he had ties to the CIA..

... and the CIA was completely out of control at the time. As far as anyone knows, Squeaky Fromme or Sara Moore had no connections to our "intelligence" agencies. Hinckley, well that is subject to some conjecture.

Hey, I don't doubt for a second that Oswald fired shots from the SBD building and that one or more of them hit JFK. I just don't accept that it was totally his idea and totally his execution.

And I don't think "excited utterances" (look it up, it has special meaning in a court of law) of "I'm a patsy" is the best creative lie out of the mouth of someone being arrested.

And when I see pictures of Oswald after his arrest I don't see someone worried about the future I see someone thinking "wait til you guys hear THIS".

And when "coincidence" piles on to "coincidence" all in such a manner as to make the truth impossible to discern (Jack Ruby for example, autopsy reports for another, really, the list goes on and on) then they are probably NOT coincidences.

And finally, cui bono? JFK made lots of enemies in a hurry, from the Federal Reserve, to the MIC, to the CIA, to organized crime and others. But when he's killed its not one of his mortal enemies it is some random doofus. Nope.

I'm not accepting your version because my knowledge of the history of the time won't let me. Is it "possible" that Oswald truly acted alone? Of course. I give that about a 10% chance.