Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Unsure If Hillary Clinton Is 'Forceful Advocate For Working Families' [View all]InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)90. Couldn't agree more. Hillary only has Hillary's best interests at heart, making speeches at $500,000 a pop. Gimme a fuckin' break!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders Unsure If Hillary Clinton Is 'Forceful Advocate For Working Families' [View all]
Capt. Obvious
Nov 2013
OP
If the "working family" has a hedge fund manager and owns stock in Walmart, she'd be an advocate. nt
NYC_SKP
Nov 2013
#2
We must get a progressive to challenge her. And we cant wait until 2015 like all the
rhett o rick
Nov 2013
#3
If a progressive won, they could at best be Dr. No without a progressive majority in Congress
yurbud
Nov 2013
#118
imagine Hillary in Kerry's position with Iran. Her with that 'obliterate' mind set...
Whisp
Nov 2013
#113
You are correct. That's why we need to urge him to run as a Democrat in the
totodeinhere
Nov 2013
#10
They have way more power than does the President on single issues and we need both desperately
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#62
Now, that isn't fair. I'm sure Democrats care air the whole top 10%, maybe even the top 20.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2013
#119
Yes. Let's trash Hillary and the sold-out, anti-middle-class economic philosophy she represents.
JDPriestly
Nov 2013
#30
On the contrary, she's the most electable candidate the Democrats have at this time.
Beacool
Nov 2013
#48
Wait, so Hillary Clinton is unelectable but Bernie Sanders...is? Have I stepped into bizarro world?
Metric System
Nov 2013
#66
Bernie's message is far more appealing than a lot of corporate Democrats realize.
JDPriestly
Nov 2013
#73
You're being wayyy too kind. Hillary only looks out for herself and her corporate buddies, not the common folks.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2013
#89
Seriously, the LAST thing we need is Hillary and her tired old Rethug-lite policies. Elizabeth or Bernie for me TYVM.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2013
#87
Couldn't agree more. Hillary only has Hillary's best interests at heart, making speeches at $500,000 a pop. Gimme a fuckin' break!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2013
#90
Hillary may campaign left as a consequence, but she'll probably do that anyway.
NorthCarolina
Nov 2013
#106
Follow the money - the oldest rule of humanity. Money has corrupted the human race.
AAO
Nov 2013
#40
Yeah! Bill Clinton was so much for the little guy that he did away with Glass-Steagall.
JDPriestly
Nov 2013
#34
Stop trying to use reasoning and logic. The far Left is getting ready to try to Nader
bluestate10
Nov 2013
#51
The 90s were a different era, and true or not, Hillary represents going backward to the 90s,
JDPriestly
Nov 2013
#52
Are you being sarcastic? Bill Clinton for the little guy? Great job reforming welfare (now I'm being sarcastic).
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2013
#94
LOL, hell no. For her last speech, Hillary got paid $450,000 by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s Global Financial Leadership Conference.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2013
#121
I agree with your subject line. Disagree with the second. People should vote their best decision,
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#111
I hear you and, yet we can't change some things...like the Electoral College for one.
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#107
See, that's what everybody thought and are disappointed or angry about. Progressiveism is
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#110
The Clintons used to take pride in being able to raise more corporate money than Republicans.
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2013
#70
When have the Clintons ever been forceful advocates for anyone else but their friends in high places
Democracyinkind
Nov 2013
#76
Succinctly put. The Clintons only look out for themselves and their corporate buddies. It's time to look forward and move on.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2013
#95
Duh - Hillary Progressive - No Way -- Corporate DLCer Through And Through
cantbeserious
Nov 2013
#83