Those who demand that everyone "just ACCEPT that Oswald did it"...

[nyquil_man]

325. You accept his 'proof' without challenge.

That's rather atypical of you. You argue with me in post after post, when I'm in no position to start a reinvestigation except through the same methods as you, and you do it with enormous conviction. But you shrink at the notion of even contacting your representative.

Okay, so you can't persuade him. Can you beat him? Has he got an opponent in 2014? Or do you accept his 'proof' that he can't be beaten, too?

I shudder to think of how many social movements would have floundered on the rocks if those involved had simply given up, on the premise that the forces arrayed against them couldn't be beaten.

Now, as far as money goes, you ignore the fact that there are people on your side of this debate who do have great big checkbooks. Oliver Stone and those who helped finance his film come to mind. Time Warner, which released the film, has spent nearly $3 million on lobbying in this year alone. Did they devote any of it to getting a new investigation, or were they all only in it for the profit?

Where are they?