Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: JFK Conference: David Talbot named Allen Dulles as 'the Chairman of the Board of the Assassination' [View all]Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)130. Nope.
R. PETTY -- "Yes, sir, I believe that they were struck by the same bullet and I have so previously stated in the preliminary report of the panel."
MR. PREYER -- "Would you summarize briefly your reasons why you believe this to be the case?"
DR. PETTY -- "Yes, sir, I will be very glad to, Mr. Preyer. I think it is necessary at this point to sum up, in a sense, the flight of the bullet and its effect on those it struck. The bullet that struck the late President in the upper right back area and then went on to penetrate the soft structures of the neck and to exit in the front of the neck was, as has been indicated already, traveling in a somewhat upward direction, anatomically speaking.
"Anatomists many years ago decided--the better to understand each other--to place a body in a specific position and to relate all of the descriptions of the landmarks of the body to the body in that position. That position actually is a person standing erect facing forward with both palms turned forward. This is the anatomic position and in tracing the inshoot wound on the back of the late President and connecting it with a more-or-less straight line with the outshoot wound on the front of the neck, the bullet will have followed a slightly upward direction.
"But the President was not upright at the time he was shot, he was certainly not in the anatomic position, and this explains, I believe, the objection that Dr. Wecht had and his argument that he could not understand how the bullet pursued a downward track from where it was discharged, then an upward track in the President and then a downward track into Mr. Connally.
"A second point that must be mentioned--the bullet that penetrated the back of the President exited the front, struck no bone. If it did strike any bone, the bone that it struck was fragile and certainly not markedly disrupted. It did not go through his spinal column. It did not go through bone that was solid and hard and offered great resistance to passage. In effect, it went through several inches of very soft tissue.
"There is no evidence on the X-rays that the bullet broke up in passing from the back to the front. There was no deformity, in my opinion, of the bullet as it went through the President.
"Now, the second object that this single bullet struck was Mr. Connally sitting somewhere in front of the President, and this is another point that Dr. Wecht has brought up repeatedly, and that is that there was no way to join, by means of a straight line, the bullet exiting from the President and striking the Governor.
"Indeed, there was one diagram yesterday that was showing the bullet making more-or-less right angle turns, which I am certain did not happen. As a matter of fact, I would suggest that from looking at the films taken of the actual assassination that the apparent relative positions of the President and the Governor are somewhat misleading, that is, that one cannot determine by looking at a flat two-dimensional view of one side of the limousine and the contained individuals precisely what relationship they had one to another."
DR. PETTY -- "Next, the bullet in striking Mr. Connally did not penetrate the chest in the usual sense of the word. The bullet did indeed enter the back and side of the chest near the armpit, and it did follow the course of the rib on its lateral or outer aspect, and it did indeed exit beneath the right nipple, but there is no evidence that that bullet actually penetrated the rib.
"Indeed, one of the surgeons who cared for the Governor, Dr. Shaw, stated to me that the bullet did not penetrate the lung but that the rib was shattered, and it is my opinion that this bullet in slapping against the rib shattered it in a place that the rib is quite vulnerable, and then proceeded to follow rather closely the slope of the rib and then finally to exit in the front of the chest.
"The X-rays fail to show any evidence of particles of metal in the chest. Therefore, in my opinion, the bullet was not significantly deformed during its passage in the chest of the Governor.
"Next, The bullet did indeed enter the wrist, and although the reports are somewhat difficult to understand, it apparently entered more on the back of the wrist and then exited more on the front of the wrist, and again as in the chest wound, this was a tangentially placed shot which shattered the bone--there is no question of that--it shattered and caused a comminuted fracture of the radius, and then went on to exit.
"Here for the first time, fragments of bullet substance are found, and it is here, in my opinion, that the bullet first significantly deformed. Then having exhausted itself, and at a very low velocity, it continued on to bounce in and out of the thigh of the Governor.
"Now, let me recapitulate this. The bullet penetrated one individual without deformity, leaving none of its metal behind. In the second person it penetrated the chest, slapping in a tangential manner against the rib, fracturing the rib, and damaging incidentally the underlying lung, because the rib was thrown against the lung, and then went on again without leaving any of its substance so as to enter the wrist where it finally left off a portion of its substance, not much, but some.
"There is nothing here that is unusual or spectacular or unexpected. This is the behavior of a full metal jacketed bullet, a bullet covered in all areas except the base by means of the firm, hard, tough, not easy to deform jacket.
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol1/pdf/HSCA_Vol1_0908_1_Petty.pdf
MR. PREYER -- "Would you summarize briefly your reasons why you believe this to be the case?"
DR. PETTY -- "Yes, sir, I will be very glad to, Mr. Preyer. I think it is necessary at this point to sum up, in a sense, the flight of the bullet and its effect on those it struck. The bullet that struck the late President in the upper right back area and then went on to penetrate the soft structures of the neck and to exit in the front of the neck was, as has been indicated already, traveling in a somewhat upward direction, anatomically speaking.
"Anatomists many years ago decided--the better to understand each other--to place a body in a specific position and to relate all of the descriptions of the landmarks of the body to the body in that position. That position actually is a person standing erect facing forward with both palms turned forward. This is the anatomic position and in tracing the inshoot wound on the back of the late President and connecting it with a more-or-less straight line with the outshoot wound on the front of the neck, the bullet will have followed a slightly upward direction.
"But the President was not upright at the time he was shot, he was certainly not in the anatomic position, and this explains, I believe, the objection that Dr. Wecht had and his argument that he could not understand how the bullet pursued a downward track from where it was discharged, then an upward track in the President and then a downward track into Mr. Connally.
"A second point that must be mentioned--the bullet that penetrated the back of the President exited the front, struck no bone. If it did strike any bone, the bone that it struck was fragile and certainly not markedly disrupted. It did not go through his spinal column. It did not go through bone that was solid and hard and offered great resistance to passage. In effect, it went through several inches of very soft tissue.
"There is no evidence on the X-rays that the bullet broke up in passing from the back to the front. There was no deformity, in my opinion, of the bullet as it went through the President.
"Now, the second object that this single bullet struck was Mr. Connally sitting somewhere in front of the President, and this is another point that Dr. Wecht has brought up repeatedly, and that is that there was no way to join, by means of a straight line, the bullet exiting from the President and striking the Governor.
"Indeed, there was one diagram yesterday that was showing the bullet making more-or-less right angle turns, which I am certain did not happen. As a matter of fact, I would suggest that from looking at the films taken of the actual assassination that the apparent relative positions of the President and the Governor are somewhat misleading, that is, that one cannot determine by looking at a flat two-dimensional view of one side of the limousine and the contained individuals precisely what relationship they had one to another."
DR. PETTY -- "Next, the bullet in striking Mr. Connally did not penetrate the chest in the usual sense of the word. The bullet did indeed enter the back and side of the chest near the armpit, and it did follow the course of the rib on its lateral or outer aspect, and it did indeed exit beneath the right nipple, but there is no evidence that that bullet actually penetrated the rib.
"Indeed, one of the surgeons who cared for the Governor, Dr. Shaw, stated to me that the bullet did not penetrate the lung but that the rib was shattered, and it is my opinion that this bullet in slapping against the rib shattered it in a place that the rib is quite vulnerable, and then proceeded to follow rather closely the slope of the rib and then finally to exit in the front of the chest.
"The X-rays fail to show any evidence of particles of metal in the chest. Therefore, in my opinion, the bullet was not significantly deformed during its passage in the chest of the Governor.
"Next, The bullet did indeed enter the wrist, and although the reports are somewhat difficult to understand, it apparently entered more on the back of the wrist and then exited more on the front of the wrist, and again as in the chest wound, this was a tangentially placed shot which shattered the bone--there is no question of that--it shattered and caused a comminuted fracture of the radius, and then went on to exit.
"Here for the first time, fragments of bullet substance are found, and it is here, in my opinion, that the bullet first significantly deformed. Then having exhausted itself, and at a very low velocity, it continued on to bounce in and out of the thigh of the Governor.
"Now, let me recapitulate this. The bullet penetrated one individual without deformity, leaving none of its metal behind. In the second person it penetrated the chest, slapping in a tangential manner against the rib, fracturing the rib, and damaging incidentally the underlying lung, because the rib was thrown against the lung, and then went on again without leaving any of its substance so as to enter the wrist where it finally left off a portion of its substance, not much, but some.
"There is nothing here that is unusual or spectacular or unexpected. This is the behavior of a full metal jacketed bullet, a bullet covered in all areas except the base by means of the firm, hard, tough, not easy to deform jacket.
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol1/pdf/HSCA_Vol1_0908_1_Petty.pdf
And here is a Carcano bullet fired through a human wrist at a velocity of 1100fps. It's deformed less than CE399; is hardly deformed at all.
.htmlEdit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
180 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
JFK Conference: David Talbot named Allen Dulles as 'the Chairman of the Board of the Assassination' [View all]
Octafish
Nov 2013
OP
I think Obama may be facing the same kind of opposition and a lot of things are beyond
kelliekat44
Nov 2013
#1
Omg! I knew a little about this, but like so many others, found it hard to process. But if we are
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#71
Allen Dulles and JCS chairman Lemnitzer told JFK the best time to attack USSR was 'Fall 1963'
Octafish
Nov 2013
#20
A lot of people probably don't know this major policy speech President Kennedy gave...
Historic NY
Nov 2013
#98
I wasnt referring to you. I clearly said that I was not accusing you. I dont even know
rhett o rick
Nov 2013
#18
I don't know. That's why I want to see ALL the government's JFK records opened.
Octafish
Nov 2013
#17
No one at Duquesne expressed condescension and bullying to those with opposing views.
Octafish
Nov 2013
#50
The problem isn't what I know or can can prove. The problem is CIA and secret government.
Octafish
Nov 2013
#61
"This takes me back to the good old days in the old 911 forum. Truthers had reams of "evidence" too.
dotymed
Nov 2013
#80
You are right in a way. Who it would not draw are authoritarian personalities who are
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#101
J. Edgar Hoover told LBJ that the Oswald in Mexico City wasn't the same guy in Dallas jail.
Zen Democrat
Nov 2013
#52
No No No. The FBI Director told POTUS that they had video and voice recordings of the man
Zen Democrat
Nov 2013
#131
R#6 & K saluting the inimitable, indefatigable Octafish, gratitude for what he brings here
UTUSN
Nov 2013
#8
Actually it's reality going back to Walter Jenkin's 29 November 1963 memo to LBJ
Bolo Boffin
Nov 2013
#49
To go along with the LBJ plan, which was to keep the USA from going to war with the USSR.
Octafish
Nov 2013
#81
Why would Katzenbach send this memo to Bill Moyers, before any of the facts were in?
Mc Mike
Nov 2013
#83
Thanks McMike. That memo is testament that the government was interested in Oswald being framed
avaistheone1
Nov 2013
#116
Eisenhower and Smedley Butler Warned us about the MIC and Intelligence agencies.
dballance
Nov 2013
#12
David Slawson, Warren Commission investigator, tried to warn us and was told to zip it...
Octafish
Nov 2013
#104
''The younger Dulles saw no separation between his business and the country's business.''
Octafish
Nov 2013
#107
The JFK assassination was a very important event in all our lives. Thank you for your reports.
rhett o rick
Nov 2013
#14
Dulles assassinated a political ally of President Kennedy three days before JFK's inaugural.
Octafish
Nov 2013
#113
I second robertpaulsen's remarks of praise to you Octofish and extend to rhettorick
2banon
Nov 2013
#118
after the big 'stinks' caused by assassinations with guns, they discovered small plane crashes
certainot
Nov 2013
#21
to many preventive 'accidents', and until people quit calling 'tinfoil' every time, it will continue
certainot
Nov 2013
#145
i remember that. there used to be a list of these 'airplane accidents' at unknownnews.net by cheryl
certainot
Nov 2013
#146
A key procedural thing is that there was no advocate for the truth in these proceedings
BlueStreak
Nov 2013
#141
You forgot your links to the Warren Report, you know, the source in question.
GoneFishin
Dec 2013
#157
Okay then, let's presume for just a moment that the conspiracy version is correct.
Spider Jerusalem
Dec 2013
#158
There was a hole in the windshield, and we don't know about his left brain because it disappeared nt
GoneFishin
Dec 2013
#168
The investigation of Bobby Baker would have involved not only LBJ, but RFK, Hoover and JFK
mc51tc
Nov 2013
#48
Wait a minute. So, according to you, this "Bobby picked Dulles" crap is based on ...
Zen Democrat
Nov 2013
#53
LBJ said in 1969, after leaving office, that he always suspected a conspiracy.
Zen Democrat
Nov 2013
#129
May light be shone in every crook and cranny until the truth, the whole truth triumphs
indepat
Nov 2013
#39
Confirming imo 'pukes will do whatever is necessary to gain and retain control, a clear and
indepat
Dec 2013
#160
''Dulles had even less respect for Jack Kennedy's authority than he did for FDR's.''
Octafish
Dec 2013
#165
The recent Rolling Stone article by RFK JR., is very enlightening as to his brother's
maddiemom
Nov 2013
#76
The Oligarchs And Corporations Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us
cantbeserious
Nov 2013
#90
K&R + some more informative links (Thank you-your DU journal and BFEE series is among the best when
bobthedrummer
Nov 2013
#108
Thank you, bobthedrummer! Here are the posts on the sad anniversary and the Duquesne Conference...
Octafish
Nov 2013
#140
US News & World Report asked Sabato and 5 other academics: 'Was it a conspiracy?'
Octafish
Dec 2013
#174
So, apart from insults for his critics, you've nothing to say about Allen Dulles?
Octafish
Nov 2013
#152