Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Noam Chomsky: Modern universities designed to ‘deprive you of your freedom’ [View all]Romulox
(25,960 posts)34. LOL. "Normal distribution" my eye.
The Gini coefficient amounts to a kind of percentage and can run from 0 to 100. A Gini of 0 represents 0 percent concentration in a countrys income distribution. In a country with a Gini coefficient of 0, everyone receives exactly the same income.
A Gini coefficient of 100 represents 100 percent concentration in a countrys income distribution. In a country with a Gini of 100, one person receives all of the countrys income. Everyone else gets nothing.
In between 0 and 100, Gini coefficients are harder to interpret. A Gini coefficient of 50 represents 50 percent concentration in a countrys income distribution. What does it mean to have 50 percent concentration in a countrys income?
A Gini of 50 could mean that half the people share all of the income while the other half get nothing. In other words, a country that literally consisted of haves and have-nots in a 50-50 split would have a Gini coefficient of 50.
This scenario, of course, isnt very realistic. Everyone, no matter how poor, has to have some income to live. There are no literal have-nots.
We could also have a Gini coefficient of 50 with the top 10 percent of a countrys population very well-off, the next 50 percent more or less equal, and the bottom 40 percent very poor.
With some fiddling around the edges, thats more or less the situation in America today.
According to the Census Bureau, the official Gini coefficient for the United States was 46.9 in 2010, the most recent year with data available. This is way up from the all-time low of 38.6 set in 1968.
- See more at: http://inequality.org/unequal-americas-income-distribution/#sthash.uql38duV.dpuf
A Gini coefficient of 100 represents 100 percent concentration in a countrys income distribution. In a country with a Gini of 100, one person receives all of the countrys income. Everyone else gets nothing.
In between 0 and 100, Gini coefficients are harder to interpret. A Gini coefficient of 50 represents 50 percent concentration in a countrys income distribution. What does it mean to have 50 percent concentration in a countrys income?
A Gini of 50 could mean that half the people share all of the income while the other half get nothing. In other words, a country that literally consisted of haves and have-nots in a 50-50 split would have a Gini coefficient of 50.
This scenario, of course, isnt very realistic. Everyone, no matter how poor, has to have some income to live. There are no literal have-nots.
We could also have a Gini coefficient of 50 with the top 10 percent of a countrys population very well-off, the next 50 percent more or less equal, and the bottom 40 percent very poor.
With some fiddling around the edges, thats more or less the situation in America today.
According to the Census Bureau, the official Gini coefficient for the United States was 46.9 in 2010, the most recent year with data available. This is way up from the all-time low of 38.6 set in 1968.
- See more at: http://inequality.org/unequal-americas-income-distribution/#sthash.uql38duV.dpuf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Noam Chomsky: Modern universities designed to ‘deprive you of your freedom’ [View all]
xchrom
Nov 2013
OP
Now you get this Chomsky?! The man who works for one of the most OVERPRICED schools in the nation.
vaberella
Nov 2013
#6
Do you have anything constructive to post that refutes Professor Chomsky's point,
Maedhros
Dec 2013
#44
It's hard not to see him as a hypocrit since he benefited from living off of...
aikoaiko
Dec 2013
#53
My maternal grandfather grew up very poor during the Depression but earned a PhD in physics
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#43
Good to hear. Unfortunately even state schools and colleges are prohibitive these days, particularly
Mass
Nov 2013
#17
So you think exorbitant tuition *hasn't* become an important societal issue?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#46