General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sunday Dental Thread: Leaking Composite Restorations and the Kennedy Assassination: [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)It was not one but two independent experts who analyzed both the bullet found in the stretcher and also the bullet fragments found in JFK's car. Both came to the same conclusion: that the "magic" bullet and the fragments from the bullet that hit JFK in the head were fired from Oswald's rifle.
On the other hand, what evidence is there of multiple gunmen or any kind of conspiracy? The answer is, none, apart from the belief that a lone nut couldn't or shouldn't be able to change the course of history by shooting the most powerful man in the world. But, while tempting, this belief is not rational, at least from a historical perspective. There are plenty of examples of lone nuts shooting US presidents, and no examples of vast conspiracies involving the CIA/FBI/MIC or any of the other usual suspects.
People who believe in the lone gunman are persuaded by science and by evidence. Perhaps one can justify skepticism of science, along the same lines of reasoning that global warming deniers use (the whole "I don't believe in experts" thing you seem to be driving at). But how can you justify your apparent certainty that the lone gunman theory is wrong?