General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sunday Dental Thread: Leaking Composite Restorations and the Kennedy Assassination: [View all]Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Name it.
Not "but J Edgar Hoover supposedly said", not "but JFK hated Allen Dulles". Not hearsay and speculation and connecting random dots. Actual evidence.
You know what the actual evidence says? That the bullet that killed Kennedy was fired from Oswald's rifle, from the sixth floor of the TSBD. That a single bullet struck Kennedy and Connally. That there were only three shots, all fired from Oswald's rifle, that was found on the sixth floor of the TSBD along with three spent shells. That there were no other shooters in Dealey Plaza. No other shots. That a bullet from Oswald's revolver, that was in his possession when he was arrested, killed a police officer. That the timing of JFK's Dallas visit, and the selection of the Trade Mart as the event location, when taken into account with the known manner in which Oswald got the job and the date he started work, was such as to preclude any conspiracy in the selection of the motorcade route. That the timing of Oswald's transfer to the county jail, which had been announced on television and radio for 10am (at which time Jack Ruby was still at home) was delayed, and that the timing of Ruby's shooting of Oswald and the surrounding circumstances are of such a nature as to preclude conspiracy. This is what all of the verifiable evidence of ballistics and forensics says, and what a reasonable analysis of the circumstances surrounding Oswald's presence in the TSBD and Ruby's presence at Oswald's transfer says. On the other side, against all of this evidence, we have...what? Assertions unsupported by substantiative evidence in multiple investigations.