General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Those who demand that everyone "just ACCEPT that Oswald did it"... [View all]stopbush
(24,409 posts)That said, you've obviously misinterpreted the very text you've quoted in this post. Read it again. It's clearly saying that the doctor could not see the BACK of JFK's Head (JFK was "lying on his back" , and that the doctor "lifted the president's head" to "examine the president for any wounds that were not visible from his position, lying on his back."
How you construe that clear description into the doctor discovering an entry wound to JFK's forehead is beyond common sense.
As far as Arlen Specter goes, I suggest you read the actual testimony of the WCR. Specter hardly intimidates witnesses. He does ask them for more precision and detail in their answers. This was, after all, a murder investigation. This idea that Specter intimidated witnesses was covered recently in another JFK thread on DU. The fact that there was no sign of intimidation in the testimony led one JFK CTist to opine that the intimidation obviously took place off the record!!
Again, more idiocy that shows just how ridiculous you JFK CTists will go to protect your fantasies.
The lone gunman FACT fits the evidence in the case. That's why I believe it.
Who should you believe? Certainly not a doctor who was in the operating room, when his recollection of the wounds to JFK were disputed by many of the other doctors in the operating room. As usual, the CTists pick out the ONE doctor who seems to support their theory, when the intellectually honest thing to say is that different doctors at Parkland saw different things, things that contradicted what others saw.
Which is why there are autopsies.