Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: in 1952 [View all]

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
2. Also in 1952, there were no homeless even among
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:42 PM
Dec 2013

the very poor with the exception of hobos, who wanted that life style. I wonder if there is any correlation?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

in 1952 [View all] xchrom Dec 2013 OP
In 1945 it was just less than half. K&R Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #1
Also in 1952, there were no homeless even among Cleita Dec 2013 #2
Interesting, do you have a link to a source for that? HereSince1628 Dec 2013 #6
I lived through those days and I never saw a ragged person Cleita Dec 2013 #10
In the 50's and early 60'We called them "bums". There was a "bum" camp along an abandoned rail spur HereSince1628 Dec 2013 #16
Those were hobos and they liked the lifestyle. Cleita Dec 2013 #17
I'm not sure they were hobos...at least by traditional definitions I don't know how HereSince1628 Dec 2013 #18
In my day either you were a hobo or you were a skid row bum, yet even Cleita Dec 2013 #21
But a lot of the mentally ill were warehoused against their will in hospitals n/t n2doc Dec 2013 #8
Maybe the against their will was wrong, but there were beds available that Cleita Dec 2013 #11
True n2doc Dec 2013 #14
Why would forced incarceration in jail be preferable to forced up Cleita Dec 2013 #19
It is clearly worse n2doc Dec 2013 #20
Our President said that corporate taxes are too high. Enthusiast Dec 2013 #3
him and a lot of our 'overlords'. they have reached consensus. nt xchrom Dec 2013 #4
What I've heard him say repeatedly is that the corporate tax rate is too high. It should be reduced, okaawhatever Dec 2013 #12
I do not trust "centrist" Democrats to actually increase corporate revenue Enthusiast Dec 2013 #22
Brilliant idea for a poster. Interesting to see the stats across the G20. snagglepuss Dec 2013 #5
One of the few good things in "the good old days" progressoid Dec 2013 #7
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #9
I don't understand the wording. The first sentence includes "all revenue" the second sentence okaawhatever Dec 2013 #13
And the upper tax bracket was 90%. pampango Dec 2013 #15
and what was the unemployment rate? treestar Dec 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»in 1952»Reply #2