Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Scientist Predicts the Future [View all]AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)29. Yes, you are wrong.
And no, the science, the actual science, does not indicate an actual risk of total humann extinction.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'd argue that climate doomers live in their own reality, worshipping their own fictions............
AverageJoe90
Dec 2013
#8
Points taken. I suppose I was more enamored with troll/droll phrasing than was warranted.
WowSeriously
Dec 2013
#39
Actual, you did your edit at the same time he responded. ( 5:35 )Timestamps ROCK!
snooper2
Dec 2013
#55
Essentially the same process as a plant, yes. But technology is much more efficient.
Hosnon
Dec 2013
#52
What actual science have I dismissed.....oh, wait a minute, I know! None. That's what. nt
AverageJoe90
Dec 2013
#25
Providing of course that you can afford the premiums, deductibles and copays n/t
Fumesucker
Dec 2013
#5
No, I was thinking genetic modification so humans have the tooth factory of sharks.
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2013
#23
Predictions schmedictions. Remember underground fiber optic cables? I predict...
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#36
I'm just glad we now live in a paperless society, as was predicted decades ago
Motown_Johnny
Dec 2013
#56