Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)If porn is a legitimate means of commercial activity, how do its fans feel about regulating it? [View all]
Let's just assume, arguendo, that its production is no more or less respectable than working at McDonald's or practicing law or assembling automobile components. No shame, no moral judgments, just any old economic activity for $$.
In that case, is there a rational argument against regulations designed to protect workers' health?
For instance, mandatory condom usage to protect them against exposure to disease, including HIV.
How did this pro-freedom, liberal industry respond when local jurisdictions passes measures to protect workers health?
Why, of course, they determined their best choice was to seek out places that don't protect workers' health.
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/feb/21/local/la-me-porn-condoms-20120221
The landmark law marks a rare attempt to regulate how films are made, threatening an industry that has been a source of millions of dollars in revenue. AIDS activists are gathering signatures for a countywide ballot measure that would extend the ban to dozens of additional communities.
The industry, however, is fighting back. Leaders say they are considering plans to fight back either in court or by moving filming out of town.
It's a debate that pits the desire to protect the health of porn actors against the freedom to make films that audiences want to see.
The Los Angeles City Council acted earlier this year after a series of incidents in which adult film productions were suspended amid concerns that HIV had been transmitted among performers. Despite the health risks of having unprotected sex on movie sets, the industry has strongly opposed a condom requirement, saying that monthly testing already safeguards performers and that customers won't pay to see such films.
The industry, however, is fighting back. Leaders say they are considering plans to fight back either in court or by moving filming out of town.
It's a debate that pits the desire to protect the health of porn actors against the freedom to make films that audiences want to see.
The Los Angeles City Council acted earlier this year after a series of incidents in which adult film productions were suspended amid concerns that HIV had been transmitted among performers. Despite the health risks of having unprotected sex on movie sets, the industry has strongly opposed a condom requirement, saying that monthly testing already safeguards performers and that customers won't pay to see such films.
Protecting workers, encouraging practices that fight disease in the general public, especially HIV, apparently are secondary concerns to the almighty dollar.
But, hey, only crazy man-hating feminists and religious fundamentalists have an objection to that industry, so we've been told.
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If porn is a legitimate means of commercial activity, how do its fans feel about regulating it? [View all]
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
OP
what if the adults making the film agree to go bareback, would you still insist they cant
loli phabay
Dec 2013
#12
I think producers should be responsible for the safety of their employees.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#22
Because there is a health issue involved and this is high risk behavior so barebacking should be
hrmjustin
Dec 2013
#25
Better check into that. The helmet rule was grandfathered. The first year only ROOKIES had to wear
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#100
simply put its what people want to see, there are also acts that follow after that are part of sex
loli phabay
Dec 2013
#111
Two examples: Rugby and Australian Rules Football. Rough stuff that... and no helmets! n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#95
Yes but this is a health issue. They could spread it and that is a health issue.
hrmjustin
Dec 2013
#63
doesn't NASCAR require things like helmets, certain types of clothing, cars are regulated also ?
JI7
Dec 2013
#82
There was a male porn actor recently who altered a positive test for syphilis
mythology
Dec 2013
#51
this would apply only to professionally produced stuff, not amateur home movies nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#5
remember though a lot of the amateur stuff is better produced than the pro stuff nowadays
loli phabay
Dec 2013
#8
amateur stuff isn't commerce, so it's not subject to that kind of regulation nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#11
technically it is part of commerce, as you pay to be a member of a site that hosts
loli phabay
Dec 2013
#17
"Amateur" are considered professional in many cases because they earn money. Its not for free.
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#36
Are you going to make every couple that screws in front of a camera use condoms?
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#3
Just those who get paid to do it. Just like the McDonalds kitchen is regulated
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#6
Whatever. Quibble about the word "art", fine. Banksy has made graffiti "art". Andy kaufman made
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#20
you know porn has been art forever as well from the first cave paintings of ugg and ogg
loli phabay
Dec 2013
#120
See my #36 above. Even folks termed "amateurs" are getting paid most of the time. nt
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#37
Well, so what? Safety and public health are much more important concerns nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#23
Public health and worker safety are more important than the ability of pornographers to get rich nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#33
Pretending is your forte, and pretending that any of those laws were passed for any reason beyond
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2013
#28
I think you meant filth, but I don't do the alert thing for whiny insults.
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2013
#44
no objection to enforced weekly/or some frequent time period/ testing of all porn participants
quinnox
Dec 2013
#32
So, you being able to see 'what's appealing' in porn is more important than worker and
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#35
Why nobody has enacted a standard .xxx domain extension is completely beyond me (n/t)
derby378
Dec 2013
#143
I have no objection to any industry being subject to industrial safety regulations
LadyHawkAZ
Dec 2013
#46
I agree that workplace safety is important in all industries. So is unionizing for that matter.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#47
If LITERATURE is a legitimate means of commercial activity, how do fans feel about regulating it?
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#60
Tons of artistic expression? Or do you not think we're talking about "artistic expression"? n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#67
It says a lot that you won't answer a simple question about whether you think it's
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#85
Yes, I think all industries should have to comply with basic health and safety standards
Bjorn Against
Dec 2013
#88