General Discussion

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)

73. I thought it was already regulated.

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:17 PM

Dec 2013

Child-porn is illegal, as I agree it should be.

What you are talking about are "additional" regulations. They are a lot of both pro- and con- arguments for additional regulations for porn.

I think you are being overly emotional, as evidenced in your final statement "But, hey, only crazy man-hating feminists and religious fundamentalists have an objection to that industry, so we've been told."

Can we have a serious, logical discussion about this?

Apparently not, because it's too emotional an issue. Which is why I've avoided these threads so far. There is no logic. In the few cases where someone tries to interject logic, they are shouted down. This is not the behavior I expect from a Discussion Forum. Especially a Democratic forum in which all sides are supposed to be presented equally, so that the reader can make up their own mind.

But it seems that it is more important to "make a point", such as this post tries to do.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

145 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If porn is a legitimate means of commercial activity, how do its fans feel about regulating it? [View all] geek tragedy Dec 2013 OP

I agree with regulations that protect the workers. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #1

Irresponsible on any number of levels. nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #7

And the industry gets away with it. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #10

what if the adults making the film agree to go bareback, would you still insist they cant loli phabay Dec 2013 #12

I think producers should be responsible for the safety of their employees. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #22

I've said this before also Major Nikon Dec 2013 #124

Because there is a health issue involved and this is high risk behavior so barebacking should be hrmjustin Dec 2013 #25

What's "bareback"? nt xulamaude Dec 2013 #90

no condom JI7 Dec 2013 #93

Seriously? CFLDem Dec 2013 #48

And when they catch something the industry just says sorry? hrmjustin Dec 2013 #49

Yep CFLDem Dec 2013 #52

There is no other industry where this is the standard gollygee Dec 2013 #53

Actually good example CFLDem Dec 2013 #62

No, bad example gollygee Dec 2013 #65

It's not about people opinions. CFLDem Dec 2013 #68

I know when hockey helmets were introduced gollygee Dec 2013 #71

We're not talking partial interference CFLDem Dec 2013 #76

You're welcome :D gollygee Dec 2013 #77

Thanks CFLDem Dec 2013 #79

Better check into that. The helmet rule was grandfathered. The first year only ROOKIES had to wear cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #100

"ability to deposit semen as is necessary is most pornography." xulamaude Dec 2013 #97

Well to be frank (graphic warning) CFLDem Dec 2013 #110

good basic descriptions. loli phabay Dec 2013 #119

simply put its what people want to see, there are also acts that follow after that are part of sex loli phabay Dec 2013 #111

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Dec 2013 #130

Two examples: Rugby and Australian Rules Football. Rough stuff that... and no helmets! n/t cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #95

Well this is why I believe the industry should be required to use condoms. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #54

Your examples are flawed. Agschmid Dec 2013 #129

See post #110 CFLDem Dec 2013 #131

What does NASCAR say when a driver hits the wall going 180 mph? cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #55

That they require tons of safety equipment gollygee Dec 2013 #57

Hey you came back! Glad to see you. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #58

Thanks! cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #61

Yes but this is a health issue. They could spread it and that is a health issue. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #63

Yeah but they have to also wear all available safety gear gollygee Dec 2013 #64

Teams and drivers in NASCAR NCTraveler Dec 2013 #137

doesn't NASCAR require things like helmets, certain types of clothing, cars are regulated also ? JI7 Dec 2013 #82

Why yes. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #87

There was a male porn actor recently who altered a positive test for syphilis mythology Dec 2013 #51

Mandate condoms CFLDem Dec 2013 #56

There is a Libertarian Party gollygee Dec 2013 #75

Why would I party with those asshats CFLDem Dec 2013 #78

Agree. Agschmid Dec 2013 #128

its only enforcable to a certain extent, there is more and more amateur loli phabay Dec 2013 #2

this would apply only to professionally produced stuff, not amateur home movies nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #5

remember though a lot of the amateur stuff is better produced than the pro stuff nowadays loli phabay Dec 2013 #8

amateur stuff isn't commerce, so it's not subject to that kind of regulation nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #11

technically it is part of commerce, as you pay to be a member of a site that hosts loli phabay Dec 2013 #17

"Amateur" are considered professional in many cases because they earn money. Its not for free. stevenleser Dec 2013 #36

Are you going to make every couple that screws in front of a camera use condoms? Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #3

Just those who get paid to do it. Just like the McDonalds kitchen is regulated geek tragedy Dec 2013 #6

Actually, porn is art. rrneck Dec 2013 #16

depends on the porn i suppose, and the viewer. loli phabay Dec 2013 #19

I go further there. rrneck Dec 2013 #26

yup some of the artwork, settings etc are very artistic. loli phabay Dec 2013 #116

Whatever. Quibble about the word "art", fine. Banksy has made graffiti "art". Andy kaufman made Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #20

Graffiti was art long before anyone heard of Banksy. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #27

Lookout! Goalpost movin! Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #34

you know porn has been art forever as well from the first cave paintings of ugg and ogg loli phabay Dec 2013 #120

Exactly right. ... spin Dec 2013 #121

Those chubby figurines libodem Dec 2013 #132

See my #36 above. Even folks termed "amateurs" are getting paid most of the time. nt stevenleser Dec 2013 #37

I saw where CA was contemplating requiring safety goggles Blanket Statements Dec 2013 #4

diver porn? loli phabay Dec 2013 #70

from Niceguy1 Dec 2013 #80

18 USC 2257 jberryhill Dec 2013 #9

similar laws re: child exploitation exist in a variety of places nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #18

What's interesting IMHO... jberryhill Dec 2013 #59

I would support regulation lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #13

No one wants to see condoms. PeteSelman Dec 2013 #14

Well, so what? Safety and public health are much more important concerns nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #23

Obviously you don't sell porn. PeteSelman Dec 2013 #29

Public health and worker safety are more important than the ability of pornographers to get rich nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #33

Again, to YOU maybe. PeteSelman Dec 2013 #43

Just another industry that needs regulating. rrneck Dec 2013 #15

let them join sag, no idea why they are not members already. loli phabay Dec 2013 #21

Because they're not actors nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #24

i would say they are, they play parts, have lines even bad ones loli phabay Dec 2013 #30

I looked into it a little bit rrneck Dec 2013 #31

thanks, i always wondered the reason why. loli phabay Dec 2013 #118

Pretending is your forte, and pretending that any of those laws were passed for any reason beyond Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #28

Thank you for that idiotic, ad hominem, dishonest response. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #39

I think you meant filth, but I don't do the alert thing for whiny insults. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #44

How many jobs in the US require workers to engage in activities geek tragedy Dec 2013 #139

+1 NCTraveler Dec 2013 #138

no objection to enforced weekly/or some frequent time period/ testing of all porn participants quinnox Dec 2013 #32

So, you being able to see 'what's appealing' in porn is more important than worker and geek tragedy Dec 2013 #35

presumably, the frequent testing would stop any disease breakouts quinnox Dec 2013 #38

In reality, those tests do not prevent HIV. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #41

Let's consider what happened in Japan derby378 Dec 2013 #40

You'll never see "coin-op dispensers of schoolgirl panties" Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #123

Good to know, thanks! derby378 Dec 2013 #142

Here's a typical anti-molestation poster in a train/subway station Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #144

Will This Be A Federal Law ??? - Otherwise, They'll Just Move To A Red State... WillyT Dec 2013 #42

I'm fine with regulation Prophet 451 Dec 2013 #45

Why nobody has enacted a standard .xxx domain extension is completely beyond me (n/t) derby378 Dec 2013 #143

It's been tried several times Prophet 451 Dec 2013 #145

I have no objection to any industry being subject to industrial safety regulations LadyHawkAZ Dec 2013 #46

I agree that workplace safety is important in all industries. So is unionizing for that matter. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #47

Amateur porn makes this very, very tricky Prism Dec 2013 #50

If LITERATURE is a legitimate means of commercial activity, how do fans feel about regulating it? cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #60

Tons of commercial activity is regulated by the government n/t gollygee Dec 2013 #66

Tons of artistic expression? Or do you not think we're talking about "artistic expression"? n/t cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #67

I don't think it's particularly artistic, but that's beside the point gollygee Dec 2013 #69

So it's not a legitimate form of expression then, in your opinion? cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #72

I said that it is beside the point gollygee Dec 2013 #74

It says a lot that you won't answer a simple question about whether you think it's cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #85

Of course it is a form of artistic expression but that's beside the point gollygee Dec 2013 #96

Part of the issue, though, is that the performers are both artists petronius Dec 2013 #103

Publishing houses do have to follow OSHA regulations Bjorn Against Dec 2013 #113

I thought it was already regulated. jazzimov Dec 2013 #73

It is regulated. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #81

How about we let consenting adults be consenting adults? Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #83

like the consenting adults who work at Walmart BainsBane Dec 2013 #84

Porn = slave labor? Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #86

Not equals, uses BainsBane Dec 2013 #89

Some people get paid to be in bondage. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #91

slavery as a labor system, meaning being owned by another person BainsBane Dec 2013 #99

bet that at least one component in the machine you are using to post loli phabay Dec 2013 #114

Seems to me you aren't reading BainsBane Dec 2013 #115

why bother, you dance around when asked questions. loli phabay Dec 2013 #117

If you aren't going to read BainsBane Dec 2013 #135

Your using your work computer for "non-work" related activities! snooper2 Dec 2013 #141

Yes, I think all industries should have to comply with basic health and safety standards Bjorn Against Dec 2013 #88

I support regulations RainDog Dec 2013 #92

Refusing to consider this issue shows a willful disregard for workers rights BainsBane Dec 2013 #94

Yeah, if you actually cared about worker's rights, Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #98

You are free to write your own thread at anytime BainsBane Dec 2013 #101

When it fails miserably, can I claim that I was drunk? Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #102

300 posts is a fail? BainsBane Dec 2013 #106

It's no "Moon Bombing", that's for sure. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #125

Sure! Why not! xulamaude Dec 2013 #107

*cough* Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #109

By the way, I've started many threads about modern slavery BainsBane Dec 2013 #104

Who on earth has been refusing to consider the issue, seriously. Kurska Dec 2013 #134

+1 Orsino Dec 2013 #140

I would be for it DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #105

conversely RainDog Dec 2013 #108

Wikipedia: Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #112

I have no problem regulating commercially produced corporate porn. Xithras Dec 2013 #122

I agree it should be regulated, not sure about that particular regulation. Kurska Dec 2013 #126

Geek JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #127

One reason I think prostitution should be legal and regulated Rex Dec 2013 #133

There should be more regulations. NCTraveler Dec 2013 #136