Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Money People Will Save From ACA Will That Be A Stimulant..... [View all]backscatter712
(26,357 posts)28. There's also a lot of under-the-hood reforms that already are reducing costs...
Like the cap on the medical loss ratio, means that more of our insurance premiums are going to pay for medical care, and less for the CEO's 600 foot yacht.
Or the restructuring of Medicare payments from pay-per-procedure to pay-per-patient, meaning that there's less incentive for sleazy hospitals to run up the bill with zillions of expensive tests, and that hospitals will be more motivated to treat you correctly the first time so they don't have to pay for a re-admission.
Don't believe me? Believe the Nobel-prize winning economist...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/29/opinion/krugman-obamacares-secret-success.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20131129&_r=1&
Obamacares Secret Success
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: November 28, 2013 760 Comments
Much of the Beltway establishment scoffed at the promise of cost savings. The prevalent attitude in Washington is that reform isnt real unless the little people suffer; serious savings are supposed to come from things like raising the Medicare age (which the Congressional Budget Office recently concluded would, in fact, hardly save any money) and throwing millions of Americans off Medicaid. True, a 2011 letter signed by hundreds of health and labor economists pointed out that the Affordable Care Act contains essentially every cost-containment provision policy analysts have considered effective in reducing the rate of medical spending. But such expert views were largely ignored.
So, hows it going? The health exchanges are off to a famously rocky start, but many, though by no means all, of the cost-control measures have already kicked in. Has the curve been bent?
The answer, amazingly, is yes. In fact, the slowdown in health costs has been dramatic.
O.K., the obligatory caveats. First of all, we dont know how long the good news will last. Health costs in the United States slowed dramatically in the 1990s (although not this dramatically), probably thanks to the rise of health maintenance organizations, but cost growth picked up again after 2000. Second, we dont know for sure how much of the good news is because of the Affordable Care Act.
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: November 28, 2013 760 Comments
Much of the Beltway establishment scoffed at the promise of cost savings. The prevalent attitude in Washington is that reform isnt real unless the little people suffer; serious savings are supposed to come from things like raising the Medicare age (which the Congressional Budget Office recently concluded would, in fact, hardly save any money) and throwing millions of Americans off Medicaid. True, a 2011 letter signed by hundreds of health and labor economists pointed out that the Affordable Care Act contains essentially every cost-containment provision policy analysts have considered effective in reducing the rate of medical spending. But such expert views were largely ignored.
So, hows it going? The health exchanges are off to a famously rocky start, but many, though by no means all, of the cost-control measures have already kicked in. Has the curve been bent?
The answer, amazingly, is yes. In fact, the slowdown in health costs has been dramatic.
O.K., the obligatory caveats. First of all, we dont know how long the good news will last. Health costs in the United States slowed dramatically in the 1990s (although not this dramatically), probably thanks to the rise of health maintenance organizations, but cost growth picked up again after 2000. Second, we dont know for sure how much of the good news is because of the Affordable Care Act.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Can you imagine the relief that small businesses and other employers will enjoy?
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#1
OK, so math is hard for you. You also seem to have trouble with the English language.
DesMoinesDem
Dec 2013
#10
Exercise reduces weight. But, if you eat 5000 calories a day you're still going to gain weight.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#20
You argued that the ACA merely redistributes costs rather than having any negative
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#23
No, you were wrong on substance. Dishonestly so to the point where you lied and said
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#30
LOL. I'm eager to change the subject??? You're talking about Chained CPI on a discussion about ACA
DesMoinesDem
Dec 2013
#33
I have my answer: you think Chained CPI is NOT a reduction in benefits. nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#34
No, I'm applying your peculiar logic to another issue to see if you really believe
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#36
Whatever you say. Now go back to regurgitating Cheney, Fleischer, and Rove's NSA talking points.
DesMoinesDem
Dec 2013
#39
I agree with you. I'm not certain that the economic benefits of the ACA are
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#21
There's also a lot of under-the-hood reforms that already are reducing costs...
backscatter712
Dec 2013
#28
If You Read My Inquiry Carefully In My OP - I'm Not Talking About Healthcare Costs ....
global1
Dec 2013
#29