Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
26. Since you are taking issue with the man from Rolling Stone, I'll let Dr Thompson say it.
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 05:25 PM
Mar 2012

"Some people will say that words like scum and rotten are wrong for Objective Journalism — which is true, but they miss the point. It was the built-in blind spots of the Objective rules and dogma that allowed Nixon to slither into the White House in the first place. He looked so good on paper that you could almost vote for him sight unseen. He seemed so all-American, so much like Horatio Alger, that he was able to slip through the cracks of Objective Journalism. You had to get Subjective to see Nixon clearly, and the shock of recognition was often painful."

And you know, Rush made sexist remarks for years for great profit. He went too far when he lied and slandered a specific person, a non politician, and he did not make 'sexist remarks' he called her a prostitute who expects to get paid for sex and used her name. He claimed she said things she did not say. He lied and slandered. Anyone who sees that as the same as a joke with some gender specifics should have a long long history of speaking against Rush, who makes mere sexist comments daily, for years. As well as racist, homophobic comments. For years on end. With more than one scandal along the way. Fired from gigs in the real media for stuff he said as I recall, long ago. He is what he is. Or was what he was.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't ProSense Mar 2012 #1
Explain to me, why is Rush getting a much bigger blowback? 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #2
1. He's been doing this longer and more consistently. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #4
First ProSense Mar 2012 #5
Because, with Rush, it is the expression of a vile heart. aquart Mar 2012 #6
Because the portly drug addict is an actual misogynist Major Nikon Mar 2012 #8
Thank you all for the good responses. I really want to read the OP's opinion, though. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #9
I think part of it is that he seemed so creepy about it. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #10
Not necessary. He's going down. It's time to clean house. Zalatix Mar 2012 #13
We'd rather keep on piling on Rush. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #20
The hell with it. I don't need an answer. I know it already. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #22
Feel better now? aquart Mar 2012 #3
No "we", no "must", no "ignore" - you've lost me already. saras Mar 2012 #7
I can tell the difference between a Taibbi and a Limbaugh. Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #11
When Democratic Presidential Candidates Seek Out Matt Taibi's or Bill Maher's Yavin4 Mar 2012 #12
This "both sides do it" thing is quite true. Zalatix Mar 2012 #14
They don't do that, but Democrats haven't been above trying to use rappers RZM Mar 2012 #21
Does this mean we should boycott Shankapotomus Mar 2012 #15
Who is that? Zalatix Mar 2012 #16
A comedian Shankapotomus Mar 2012 #17
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #18
It's a simple question Shankapotomus Mar 2012 #19
I already do OriginalGeek Mar 2012 #27
Not ignore, excuse. hughee99 Mar 2012 #23
Maybe I'm a fool, but I am seriously hoping that what happened to Rush will make 'leftist' pundits jillan Mar 2012 #24
Since leftists, unlike rightists, are actually able to think and change, I think this is likely. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #25
Since you are taking issue with the man from Rolling Stone, I'll let Dr Thompson say it. Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #26
"They all do it" is the GOP's second fav political tactic. McCamy Taylor Mar 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We must ignore sexist rem...»Reply #26