Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
12. That is not what he said, though.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 10:49 AM
Dec 2013

And, I don't think it was accidental.

I think his brother, whose letter we do not see, was castigating him for being too much like FDR and HST and not ending Social Security and their other policies. Apparently, his brother is saying they are unconstitutional policies.

And Ike is defending himself to his brother by passing the buck to the Supremes.

BTW, I disagree that the Executive Branch can act as it choose unless and until the Supreme Court says otherwise. That was Gonzo's position about Bushco. However, the President takes his own oath to protect and defend the Constitution, the only person in federal government required by the Constitution so to do.

So, IMO, he has to make a good faith determination about the Constitutionality of every action he takes, including every bill he signs. And, by good faith, I don't mean getting the current equivalent of Yoo and Bybee to sign off on it.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In a letter to his brothe...»Reply #12