Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Johonny

(26,248 posts)
17. They do a lot in their way.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 12:53 PM
Dec 2013

By of course paying for development. The launch vehicle that puts the Mars mission into space goes on a USAF launch vehicle off a USAF pad. The USAF pays for the agency that does mission assurance. NASA comes to me all the time asking the USAF and its agencies it we have developed solutions for problems on missions such as Mars missions. I work with all the players involved in the field of space all the time. Including European and Russian agencies. I am reviewing NASA proposals to Mars missions right now. I am not an idiot. USAF, NASA and private companies interact all the time. The USAF develops lots of technology that NASA uses. Same with launch vehicles. There is a lot of synergy between NAVY, NOAA, NASA, USAF etc at least there is when congress doesn't pit these agencies against each other in a draconian tax cutting binge. When you cut military space you hurt all space programs. It is how US does business in space. Once again it isn't just NASA being cut it is all of US space programs which means military space as well. Which is usually NASA's backdoor to fund things because it is generally considered "safe". If you don't believe me... I don't know that is our space program.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What’s more important - m...»Reply #17