General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Would you agree that women are, anatomically speaking, weaker than men? [View all]EOTE
(13,409 posts)And torque can be used in grapples and such, but punches are not due to torque, they're due to the expansion and contraction of muscle mass. Torque is ROTATIONAL FORCE, you really don't seem to get that.
And you know that I've asked you this multiple times before, but I'm hoping you might actually respond this time. Has a professional female fighter EVER taken down a professional male fighter of similar weight? According to you, such things should not only exist, but they should be COMMON. They should be more common than the reverse, yet you're uncapable of providing even a SINGLE INSTANCE. Your experience counts for nothing, you're just some internet rando spouting out your mouth. In terms of ACTUAL EVIDENCE, there's plenty of it. Pound for pound, men are much stronger than women and much better fighters. If a typical 130lb woman got into a ring with a typical 130lb man, either the fight would be called off very early, or the woman would leave unconscious and most likely dead if the match were to proceed.