Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,458 posts)
58. But that's the problem.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 03:38 PM
Dec 2013

It might all be fun and games until there is some other beef... and then the lawyers get involved.

I used to work with a woman who liked to goof around and play grab-ass with our office that consisted of more than a handful of gay men (me being one of them). There was a lot of butt grabbing and breast grabbing.

I would steer clear of it like the plague because I have seen how these things devolve once someone decides to make an issue.

Anywhoo, she ended up taking a branch manager position at a large retail mortgage lender. And took some of her buddies with her.

One of her employees lied to a customer and "floated" their jumbo loan with the hopes of making more spread for himself. It ended up costing like $18k to close the, now underwater, loan at the customer's expected rate. They closed at the customer's rate because she could prove she requested a lock even though the loan officer lied. So my friend back-charged $18k worth of the shady loan officer's commissions. He was incensed that the branch didn't eat the deficit like they had done in the past.

Then the shit hit the fan.

She got called on the carpet with a "hostile work environment" claim, lost her job and couldn't even get unemployment.

What did her in? "That cake looks like a giant dick!"

The loan officer and one of his buddies were the witnesses. She couldn't deny it because she said it. And no amount of "but but but" would sway the HR people or their attorney.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She sounds like a dick Fumesucker Dec 2013 #1
And you don't need a penis to be a dick rock Dec 2013 #52
Lol CFLDem Dec 2013 #2
But that's the problem. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #58
Bullshit nxylas Dec 2013 #3
Thanks... SkyDaddy7 Dec 2013 #4
That is my thought too--if you're being singled out for your gender or your race, no matter if MADem Dec 2013 #7
Right! Gender discrimination is the problem, not just discrimination against women. JDPriestly Dec 2013 #10
She hasn't been tossed out because she inherited a 50% stake in the company from Tanuki Dec 2013 #15
right wingers always claim it means gays, females, minorities etc get special JI7 Dec 2013 #9
Exactly correct ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #55
Spoken like a clueless CEO Hekate Dec 2013 #5
her arguments sound like the bs that come from right wingers JI7 Dec 2013 #6
I'm sure that's the argument her lawyer is making... JHB Dec 2013 #8
I hope they take her to the cleaners leftynyc Dec 2013 #11
Or, maybe the plaintiffs are the menace. Too soon to know. merrily Dec 2013 #20
I'm assuming since there are leftynyc Dec 2013 #22
Faulty assumption, when potential for money is involved. merrily Dec 2013 #26
If it was a man being accused, I doubt many would be defending him either davidn3600 Dec 2013 #34
It also seems they are avoiding the real issue, and are trying to deflect away from it. Ikonoklast Dec 2013 #48
If she didn't do it, wouldn't her defense be "I didn't do it.", not renie408 Dec 2013 #36
You must be new here leftynyc Dec 2013 #39
My posts don't change based on the gender of the accused. merrily Dec 2013 #45
You aren't the only person on this board (n/t) leftynyc Dec 2013 #49
Nobody called her on her behavior before Savannahmann Dec 2013 #12
I have next to no doubt that someone has said SOMETHING JackInGreen Dec 2013 #13
Is the accuser, who stands to win money by suing in this instance, always truthful and the merrily Dec 2013 #19
Look at the proponderance of evidence Savannahmann Dec 2013 #23
LOL, that's not evidence. merrily Dec 2013 #25
Well, her response isn't "you're full of shit," it's "you can't do that because you're white men" Scootaloo Dec 2013 #33
I agree kcr Dec 2013 #42
According to the article, she personally does deny the charges. merrily Dec 2013 #46
I don't think it's too early to form an opinion for someone that's not on the jury. hughee99 Dec 2013 #61
Why do you think someone who forms an opinion at this stage is deemed unfit to be a juror? merrily Dec 2013 #62
Probably not necessarily unfit, but generally they ask if you know anything about the case hughee99 Dec 2013 #63
They are dismissed--sometimes very angrily by the judge--if they say they've formed an opinion. merrily Dec 2013 #64
I was actually thinking of the jury selection phase, hughee99 Dec 2013 #65
I was talking about the jury selection phase. merrily Dec 2013 #66
I've been through jury selection a few times hughee99 Dec 2013 #68
Still unfit to serve on the jury, whether dismissed cordially or harshly. merrily Dec 2013 #73
. ReRe Dec 2013 #14
Why are you assuming that the plaintiffs are truthful and she's a liar? merrily Dec 2013 #18
Okay... turn it around... ReRe Dec 2013 #28
Agree. The Raw Story article is poorly written. merrily Dec 2013 #47
I'm inclined to believe the christx30 Dec 2013 #29
It could be allegedly creating a hostile environment in the workplace. merrily Dec 2013 #27
I don't think her argument will hold water in court FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #16
The story does not give enough info for much beyond knee-jerk reactions. merrily Dec 2013 #17
Spot on. Laelth Dec 2013 #30
I just found this. merrily Dec 2013 #56
Gee, look at all the alleged left on this thread, assuming accusations = guilt. merrily Dec 2013 #21
Even if she did do these things ... Laelth Dec 2013 #31
It was all those zipper... I mean Zimmy threads! Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #41
Courts decide guilt. Posters have benign and inconsequential opinions. LanternWaste Dec 2013 #53
You're all over this thread attempting to exonerate this CEO DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2013 #67
Put on your reading glasses. Or thinking cap. Not one post I made said she was innocent, not one. merrily Dec 2013 #72
It's true that she's innocent until proven guilty nxylas Dec 2013 #69
Terrible Misunderstanding! Her lisp caused her to be misunderstood . . . cer7711 Dec 2013 #24
She confuses a couple of concepts quaker bill Dec 2013 #32
You are a member of a "protected class" just as much as she is, if not more. Major Nikon Dec 2013 #71
Not The Onion? CorrectOfCenter Dec 2013 #35
LOL, sure seems straight off the page of that. nt JudyM Dec 2013 #51
This has been going on for years. It's not new. Linkage. Blue_Adept Dec 2013 #37
Sounds like she has a penis envy problem. She could have a sex change B Calm Dec 2013 #38
Well isn't she just the sweetest thing. HappyMe Dec 2013 #40
More from the lawsuit Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #43
Lol, good one! nt Logical Dec 2013 #44
Ironically, "Penis" is the one word you can't say in an Archie Comic. FSogol Dec 2013 #50
While I haven't read the Defense pleadings ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #54
Here's the Guardian's take on the topic lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #57
May be a ploy SusieQ01 Dec 2013 #59
That's bullshit. Men can and do sue for sexual harassment BainsBane Dec 2013 #60
A better defense would be to claim Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Female CEO says white mal...»Reply #58