General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is porn bad now? I find it a weird topic for anything called "Democratic Underground"... [View all]RainDog
(28,784 posts)...the things you learn when people link to posts in places/from people you may not read.
the hof group has created its own reality and now claims that any woman who disagrees with their (majority, I'll say, don't know if its a condition of being part of the group) position on 1st amend/porn issues doesn't have an opinion of her own derived from her own study of this matter.
Instead, any woman who disagrees is seeking "pats on the head" from men.
That is, without a doubt, a truly sexist pov that is easily disproven here and in the larger world, as well. More to the point, it's so intellectually dishonest someone could not get away with saying it outside of their hidey hole of hate.
But THAT bullshit belief is also the origin of this "pat on the head" insult that you read here.
So, it's an extension of the toxic mindset of too many who associate with that group. And, more to the point, it's the sort of thinking that informs the "us vs. them" of fundamentalism in religion. they're the "one true feminists" - even tho there are many, many feminists in academia and publishing who vigorously disagree - but, apparently, they're just looking for "pats on the head" as well.
No matter that, intellectually, these women who object to censorship as a way to deal with porn could kick the asses of most every person who is making this claim.
iow, it's just small-mindedness - in more ways than one.