Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
19. Food is ingested so not an environmental toxin per se and ingestion varies from one person to the
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:09 PM
Dec 2013

next even within one household where it could be assumed that everyone is exposed to the same environmental toxins.

Many health issues have been tied to diet. The Harvard Nurse Study grinds out data year after year and has found all kinds of links which may have been obscure in smaller samples. The nurses in the study report what they eat (among many other things) and that data can be bumped against any and all physical symptoms like allergies, weight gain, heart disease, cholesterol levels. For example they figured out that drinking diet soda leads to weight gain through multivariate analysis.

But something like allergic reaction, birth defects or an endemic condition would be much more obvious and easier to pin down. The CDC is designed to pin point the cause of outbreaks (for example e coli) and if you had a large outbreak of allergic reactions when a new food is introduced they would investigate as they did for the Jack in the Box incident and many others since then.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We need more rejections like this. RC Dec 2013 #1
GM corn is the basis of 40% of the calories in the American diet KurtNYC Dec 2013 #5
Oh yes it is about whether GM corn is safe. RC Dec 2013 #6
the corn in question was GM'd by Syngenta AG - a Swiss company KurtNYC Dec 2013 #12
How would we see evidence for a particular cause of disease, pnwmom Dec 2013 #18
Food is ingested so not an environmental toxin per se and ingestion varies from one person to the KurtNYC Dec 2013 #19
So? Food we ingest and environmental exposures could and do combine pnwmom Dec 2013 #20
GM food is labelled now -- if it says HFCS, corn, canola or soy it is KurtNYC Dec 2013 #29
There is currently no Federal or state requirement that all GM food be labeled. pnwmom Dec 2013 #30
yet there are laws that require the labelling of foods which contain peanuts, KurtNYC Dec 2013 #34
Exactly. How can they justify not labeling GM foods when so many other pnwmom Dec 2013 #35
And we know that formula fed babies ingest GM corn pnwmom Dec 2013 #32
Ding, ding, ding. nt proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #38
This rejection is NOT about safety NickB79 Dec 2013 #23
China does care about the health and safety of their people KurtNYC Dec 2013 #31
Miss this? proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #10
More. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #11
Glyphosate gets used on lots of crops, not just GMs KurtNYC Dec 2013 #13
So much misdirection/information, so little time; we're not hearing what experts are seeing. WHY? proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #15
Misdirection indeed. What does pink slime and journalistic lawsuits have to do with KurtNYC Dec 2013 #21
Unreported evidence both anecdotal and peer-reviewed does exist suggesting problems with gmos. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #24
If you have any peer reviewed studies I will look them over KurtNYC Dec 2013 #33
It's disingenuous to ignore history. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #40
Check it out (includes peer-reviewed studies as citations). proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #41
That paper simply advocates the labeling of GE foods, it isn't a peer reviewed study KurtNYC Dec 2013 #43
Focus on post #40, please, especially 'Dr Pusztai on the 10th anniversary of GM safety scandal.' proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #44
Not a conspiracy, just business; see FOOD & WATER WATCH REPORT on Wikileaks cables. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #47
Business Section NYT: 'The Epi-Pen's Maker Invests in Expansion As Allergy Rates in Children Rise' proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #27
A country that allows lead in toys, rejects GMO corn? CoffeeCat Dec 2013 #2
So now we need to reject that shit Generic Other Dec 2013 #3
This is one of the key reasons we're pushing the TPP. Laelth Dec 2013 #4
TPP was my first thought... n/t HereSince1628 Dec 2013 #36
Guess there wasn't enough melamine in it nt Dreamer Tatum Dec 2013 #7
Wow, the country that sends us killer dog food has stricter measures joeybee12 Dec 2013 #8
WTF? 'feeding damage caused by moths, butterflies, and other lepidopteran insects' freshwest Dec 2013 #9
Uh, one of the most destructive corn insect pests is a moth. MineralMan Dec 2013 #16
K&R woo me with science Dec 2013 #14
Meh, China grows their own GM crops... Javaman Dec 2013 #17
what, it didn't have enough lead or melamine in it for their liking? dionysus Dec 2013 #22
"Beijing's quality watchdog" is now a reputable source? Fuck me with a rusty rake! 11 Bravo Dec 2013 #26
Here's a reputable source. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #28
More Big GMO, Inc (R) occultism Berlum Dec 2013 #37
Nah, just typical corporate maneuvering under the guise of altruistic and humanitarian motives. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #39
Additional notes re: post #43, including PLOS ONE: Complete Genes May Pass from Food to Human Blood. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #45
More. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UPI: China rejects 60,000...»Reply #19