Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: UPI: China rejects 60,000 tons of GM corn from the US. [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)24. Unreported evidence both anecdotal and peer-reviewed does exist suggesting problems with gmos.
Last edited Thu Dec 5, 2013, 10:33 PM - Edit history (1)
Food disparagement laws appear to be inhibiting experts from speaking out in the media, however,
Let's Discuss (Again): The GMO Food Debate
...In the course of reporting the piece, Shetterly spoke with a number of researchers and medical professionals who told her they couldnt go on the record about their doubts about GMOs because they feared being sued by a biotech or agriculture company, or losing grant money provided by the private sector.
...In the course of reporting the piece, Shetterly spoke with a number of researchers and medical professionals who told her they couldnt go on the record about their doubts about GMOs because they feared being sued by a biotech or agriculture company, or losing grant money provided by the private sector.
as in the recent case of "pink slime" where a scientist was sued along with the media outlet for $1.2 billion.
ABC News Sued for $1.2 Billion Over Report on 'Pink Slime'
...The lawsuit also targets Gerald Zirnstein, the USDA microbiologist who came up with the term "pink slime" and gave an interview to ABC.
...The lawsuit also targets Gerald Zirnstein, the USDA microbiologist who came up with the term "pink slime" and gave an interview to ABC.
LINKS ABOVE.
Pink slime story illustrates food disparagement law application. I am in no way suggesting the substance is a gmo.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Food is ingested so not an environmental toxin per se and ingestion varies from one person to the
KurtNYC
Dec 2013
#19
So much misdirection/information, so little time; we're not hearing what experts are seeing. WHY?
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#15
Misdirection indeed. What does pink slime and journalistic lawsuits have to do with
KurtNYC
Dec 2013
#21
Unreported evidence both anecdotal and peer-reviewed does exist suggesting problems with gmos.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#24
That paper simply advocates the labeling of GE foods, it isn't a peer reviewed study
KurtNYC
Dec 2013
#43
Focus on post #40, please, especially 'Dr Pusztai on the 10th anniversary of GM safety scandal.'
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#44
Not a conspiracy, just business; see FOOD & WATER WATCH REPORT on Wikileaks cables.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#42
Business Section NYT: 'The Epi-Pen's Maker Invests in Expansion As Allergy Rates in Children Rise'
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#27
WTF? 'feeding damage caused by moths, butterflies, and other lepidopteran insects'
freshwest
Dec 2013
#9
"Beijing's quality watchdog" is now a reputable source? Fuck me with a rusty rake!
11 Bravo
Dec 2013
#26
Nah, just typical corporate maneuvering under the guise of altruistic and humanitarian motives.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#39
Additional notes re: post #43, including PLOS ONE: Complete Genes May Pass from Food to Human Blood.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#45