Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
28. Here's a reputable source.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 05:43 PM
Dec 2013

Best and saddest expert analysis I have encountered on GMOs ever and not a word since. Please see http:/articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-09-03/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-NEW-PROTEINS. New proteins = potential allergens.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-09-03/news/0009030374_1_genetically-modified-new-proteins

"Genetically Altered Foods: We Are Being Exposed to One of the Largest Uncontrolled Experiments in History"

Martha Herbert
Chicago Tribune

September 3, 2000


BOSTON - Today the vast majority of foods in supermarkets contain genetically modified substances whose effects on our health are unknown. As a medical doctor, I can assure you that no one in the medical profession would attempt to perform experiments on human subjects without their consent. Such conduct is illegal and unethical. Yet manufacturers of genetically altered foods are exposing us to one of the largest uncontrolled experiments in modern history.

In less than five years these companies have flooded the marketplace with thousands of untested and unlabeled products containing foreign genetic material. These genetically modified foods pose several very real dangers because they have been engineered to create novel proteins that retard spoilage, produce their own pesticides against insects, or allow plants to tolerate larger and larger doses of weed killers. Despite claims that these food products are based on "sound science," in truth, neither manufacturers nor the government has studied the effects of these genetically altered organisms or their new proteins on people-especially babies, the elderly, and the sick. Can these products be toxic? Can they cause immune system problems? Can they damage an infant's developing nervous system? We need answers to these questions, and until then genetically altered ingredients should be removed from the food we eat.

As a pediatric neurologist, I especially worry about the safety of modified foods when it comes to children. We know that the human immune system, for example, is not fully developed in infants. Consequently, pediatricians have long been concerned about early introduction of new proteins into the immature gut and developing body of small children. Infants with colic are often switched to soy formula. Yet we have no information on how they might be affected by drinking genetically engineered soy, even though this product may be their sole or major source of nutrition for months. Because these foods are unlabeled, most parents feed their babies genetically altered formula whether they want to or not. Even proteins that are normally part of the human diet may, when introduced too early, lead to auto-immune and hypersensitivity or "allergic" reactions later.

Some studies suggest that the epidemic increase in asthma (it has doubled since 1980) may have links to early dietary exposures. The behavior problems of many children with autism and attention disorders get worse when they are exposed to certain foods. Yet as more unlabeled and untested genetically engineered foods enter the market, there is no one monitoring how the millions of people with immune system vulnerability are reacting to them and the novel proteins and fragments of viruses they can contain. In fact, without labeling, there is no possible way to track such health effects. This is not sound science, and it is not sound public health.

<>

More at link.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We need more rejections like this. RC Dec 2013 #1
GM corn is the basis of 40% of the calories in the American diet KurtNYC Dec 2013 #5
Oh yes it is about whether GM corn is safe. RC Dec 2013 #6
the corn in question was GM'd by Syngenta AG - a Swiss company KurtNYC Dec 2013 #12
How would we see evidence for a particular cause of disease, pnwmom Dec 2013 #18
Food is ingested so not an environmental toxin per se and ingestion varies from one person to the KurtNYC Dec 2013 #19
So? Food we ingest and environmental exposures could and do combine pnwmom Dec 2013 #20
GM food is labelled now -- if it says HFCS, corn, canola or soy it is KurtNYC Dec 2013 #29
There is currently no Federal or state requirement that all GM food be labeled. pnwmom Dec 2013 #30
yet there are laws that require the labelling of foods which contain peanuts, KurtNYC Dec 2013 #34
Exactly. How can they justify not labeling GM foods when so many other pnwmom Dec 2013 #35
And we know that formula fed babies ingest GM corn pnwmom Dec 2013 #32
Ding, ding, ding. nt proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #38
This rejection is NOT about safety NickB79 Dec 2013 #23
China does care about the health and safety of their people KurtNYC Dec 2013 #31
Miss this? proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #10
More. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #11
Glyphosate gets used on lots of crops, not just GMs KurtNYC Dec 2013 #13
So much misdirection/information, so little time; we're not hearing what experts are seeing. WHY? proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #15
Misdirection indeed. What does pink slime and journalistic lawsuits have to do with KurtNYC Dec 2013 #21
Unreported evidence both anecdotal and peer-reviewed does exist suggesting problems with gmos. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #24
If you have any peer reviewed studies I will look them over KurtNYC Dec 2013 #33
It's disingenuous to ignore history. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #40
Check it out (includes peer-reviewed studies as citations). proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #41
That paper simply advocates the labeling of GE foods, it isn't a peer reviewed study KurtNYC Dec 2013 #43
Focus on post #40, please, especially 'Dr Pusztai on the 10th anniversary of GM safety scandal.' proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #44
Not a conspiracy, just business; see FOOD & WATER WATCH REPORT on Wikileaks cables. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #47
Business Section NYT: 'The Epi-Pen's Maker Invests in Expansion As Allergy Rates in Children Rise' proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #27
A country that allows lead in toys, rejects GMO corn? CoffeeCat Dec 2013 #2
So now we need to reject that shit Generic Other Dec 2013 #3
This is one of the key reasons we're pushing the TPP. Laelth Dec 2013 #4
TPP was my first thought... n/t HereSince1628 Dec 2013 #36
Guess there wasn't enough melamine in it nt Dreamer Tatum Dec 2013 #7
Wow, the country that sends us killer dog food has stricter measures joeybee12 Dec 2013 #8
WTF? 'feeding damage caused by moths, butterflies, and other lepidopteran insects' freshwest Dec 2013 #9
Uh, one of the most destructive corn insect pests is a moth. MineralMan Dec 2013 #16
K&R woo me with science Dec 2013 #14
Meh, China grows their own GM crops... Javaman Dec 2013 #17
what, it didn't have enough lead or melamine in it for their liking? dionysus Dec 2013 #22
"Beijing's quality watchdog" is now a reputable source? Fuck me with a rusty rake! 11 Bravo Dec 2013 #26
Here's a reputable source. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #28
More Big GMO, Inc (R) occultism Berlum Dec 2013 #37
Nah, just typical corporate maneuvering under the guise of altruistic and humanitarian motives. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #39
Additional notes re: post #43, including PLOS ONE: Complete Genes May Pass from Food to Human Blood. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #45
More. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UPI: China rejects 60,000...»Reply #28