Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: UPI: China rejects 60,000 tons of GM corn from the US. [View all]KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)31. China does care about the health and safety of their people
They execute public officials who compromise such things:
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/11/world/fg-execute11
But I agree THIS rejection is not about safety, more likely, given the timing, it is about Biden's visit and the air space dispute. China regularly uses trade war tactics to get leverage in other areas.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/12/03/biden-china-air-zone/3843023/
Many things the Chinese government does are unusual by our standards but they have to do with leveraging their power to their own interests. Yesterday they sort of threatened MicroSoft with increased piracy of its software if it doesn't extend support for XP:
http://redmondmag.com/articles/2013/12/04/pirated-windows-8.aspx
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Food is ingested so not an environmental toxin per se and ingestion varies from one person to the
KurtNYC
Dec 2013
#19
So much misdirection/information, so little time; we're not hearing what experts are seeing. WHY?
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#15
Misdirection indeed. What does pink slime and journalistic lawsuits have to do with
KurtNYC
Dec 2013
#21
Unreported evidence both anecdotal and peer-reviewed does exist suggesting problems with gmos.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#24
That paper simply advocates the labeling of GE foods, it isn't a peer reviewed study
KurtNYC
Dec 2013
#43
Focus on post #40, please, especially 'Dr Pusztai on the 10th anniversary of GM safety scandal.'
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#44
Not a conspiracy, just business; see FOOD & WATER WATCH REPORT on Wikileaks cables.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#42
Business Section NYT: 'The Epi-Pen's Maker Invests in Expansion As Allergy Rates in Children Rise'
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#27
WTF? 'feeding damage caused by moths, butterflies, and other lepidopteran insects'
freshwest
Dec 2013
#9
"Beijing's quality watchdog" is now a reputable source? Fuck me with a rusty rake!
11 Bravo
Dec 2013
#26
Nah, just typical corporate maneuvering under the guise of altruistic and humanitarian motives.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#39
Additional notes re: post #43, including PLOS ONE: Complete Genes May Pass from Food to Human Blood.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#45