Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here it comes: The Fast Track (TPA) freight train to shove the TPP down our throats [View all]solarhydrocan
(551 posts)30. How many pages of this "agreement" (treaty is so 1850's) detail actual
"Free Trade" language as opposed to fine print that strips sovereignty?
The Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty is the complete opposite of 'free trade'
Mark Weisbrot
19 November 2013
The TPP would strip our constitutional rights, while offering no gains for the majority of Americans. It's a win for corporations

Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Centre for Economic and Policy Research in Washington DC. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy. He co-wrote Oliver Stone's documentary South of the Border.
Mark Weisbrot
19 November 2013
The TPP would strip our constitutional rights, while offering no gains for the majority of Americans. It's a win for corporations
...But the TPP and its promoters are full to the brim with ironies. It is quite amazing that a treaty like the TPP can still be promoted as a "free trade" agreement when its most economically important provisions are the exact opposite of "free trade" the expansion of protectionism.
Exhibit A was released by WikiLeaks last week: the latest draft of the "intellectual property" chapter of the agreement, one of 24 (out of 29) chapters that do not have to do with trade. This chapter has provisions that will make it easier for pharmaceutical companies to get patents, including in developing countries; have these patents for more years; and extend the ability of these companies to limit access to the scientific data that is necessary for other researchers to develop new medicines. And the United States is even pushing for provisions that would allow surgical procedures to be patented provisions that may be currently against US law.
All of these measures will help raise the price of medicines and health care, which will strain public health systems and price some people out of the market for important medicines. It is interesting to see how much worse the TPP is than the WTO's Trips (Trade-Related Aspects of International Property Rights).
This, too, was a massive rip-off of consumers and patients throughout the world, but after years of struggle by health advocates and public interest groups, some of its worst features were attenuated, and further consolidation of pharmaceutical companies' interests were blocked...MORE
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/19/trans-pacific-partnership-corporate-usurp-congress

Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Centre for Economic and Policy Research in Washington DC. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy. He co-wrote Oliver Stone's documentary South of the Border.
"Free Trade" is the way they sell this to fake liberals. Kind of like Humanitarian Bombing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here it comes: The Fast Track (TPA) freight train to shove the TPP down our throats [View all]
cali
Dec 2013
OP
Alas, you're wrong. There are many in the dem party in Congress who support this shit
cali
Dec 2013
#3
I am sure this will work out for the states about as well as NAFTA did. Cue the Ross Perot video.
silvershadow
Dec 2013
#5
"Bolstering the White House's position" =s bolstering special corporate interests' position.
Divernan
Dec 2013
#10
Congress is supposed to write bills that represent the people. It is so blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#73
Corporations/ALEC have been drafting bills for decades at state and federal levels.
Divernan
Dec 2013
#75
I think most people were not aware of this unless they were very involved politically, which
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#80
And Obama is so likeable - he's the pefect con man, though that idea is sickening.
polichick
Dec 2013
#25
Yep. So FDR is turning over in his grave seeing what the leader of his party is doing.
ZM90
Dec 2013
#31
"kills the sovereignty of the United States among any other nation that signs"
magical thyme
Dec 2013
#54
All trade deals need to be done right. "2/3 say greater US role in global economy
pampango
Dec 2013
#19
The question "Do you favor or oppose new trade deals?" was not in this poll but has been before.
pampango
Dec 2013
#42
Nope, not at all. Ed Schultz seems to be the only MSNBC pundit that gives a fuck, sadly. n/t
ZM90
Dec 2013
#29
Because they think the blue-dogs are the grown-ups in the room. It's tacit admission that
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2013
#38
Wait, I'm confused. Populist minimum wage speeches AND TPP at the same time?
NuclearDem
Dec 2013
#55
Still only crickets from the media and almost nobody seems to even realize this is happening.
pa28
Dec 2013
#57
Republicans work for their masters. Those masters want to see the TPP passed.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#72
I agree. The idea that the House will give Obama enhanced power in a trade agreement which they fear
pampango
Dec 2013
#77
Exactly, and TPA must explicitly grant the president power on labor and environmental issues
tritsofme
Dec 2013
#81