General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kaptur Defeats Kucinich 94% to 4% on 100% Unverifiable E-Vote Systems in Toledo, OH? [View all]BradBlog
(2,938 posts)My thanks to Sabrina for rebutting your nonsense while I was off the grid (and before the thread was temporarily shut down due, in part, to your offense and inappropriate allegations).
While it is your BELIEF that the votes in Lucas County are not 100% unverifiable, the computer scientists and security experts whose work I have pointed to, disagree with you.
Furthermore, even you apparently disagree with you, since you are unable to proffer a single piece of evidence to verify that even a single vote cast in that election was recorded as per any voters' intent. Neither could any election official, or even the manufacturers of the Diebold AccuVote TSX on which those votes were supposedly recorded.
It's clear you do not understand how these systems work, and choose to put your faith into the accuracy of the paper records produced by the machines which may or may not reflect the actual intent of the voter. That you believe they do, without evidence to prove such an assertion, is up to you.
For you to accuse me of "propagandizing" and offering "false information" here is appalling, offensive, wholly inaccurate, and in violation of DU's standards for posting.
If you don't believe that we should be able to verify the results of an election as accurate, that's up to you. But to charge that I am a liar, despite all of the evidence I've courteously offered to demonstrate that you are simply incorrect in your beliefs, is beyond the pale.
Shame on you. If you have any actual shame.