General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: why i can't oppose the death penalty in all cases [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)Is there any actual need to execute anyone, ever?
It really is just an excellent rule to have: do not kill people.
There will be very limited instances where almost everyone will agree that there might be a need to kill people -- where the intent is to prevent a very serious harm from being committed, and never simply to kill. Individual and collective self-defence are the recognized exceptions. Persons and peoples may use force to defend against great harms. They may not just kill pre-emptively, however.
You think this particular crime is just so awful that no other punishment would do. Would do what?
Obviously it won't deter someone just like this person from doing something just like this; if it would, it would have deterred him.
There is nothing that killing him would do that imprisoning him for life, or as long as is necessary to accomplish the relevant purposes, would not do. Other than satisfy some people's desire for revenge. However, it would also sadden many people who don't share that desire.
What is moral or ethical about killing somebody as a punishment? I just don't get it.