40 years of college football's sexual assault problem

[EOTE]

153. That has nothing to do with this conversation.

These recent threads have been about why the hell her case was handled like it was. I don't know whether he raped her or not, I'm guessing we'll never know, but I believe he did. YOU are the one who suggests that you know that her charge was false. EVERY SINGLE LITTLE BIT of your so called evidence is just ridiculously sexist bullshit. So far, you have shown that you think her charge to be false because:

1) She had sex with someone else.
2) His friends back him up.
3) Someone claims that she saw him give oral sex to the accused.
4) She didn't have drugs in her system.
5) She didn't show any outward signs of trauma.

All 5 of your points are ridiculously ignorant and sexist. Let me go through them one by one.

1) You REALLY think that because a woman has sex with someone else that she can't have been raped? Do I REALLY need to explain to you how stupid this is?

2) Of COURSE his friends back him up, birds of a feather and all that.

3) Do you think that oral sex doesn't occur in rape? Rape is about power, the one with the power can make the one without the power do quite a few things they wouldn't do normally.

4) What the fuck does her being sober have to do with whether or not she was raped?

5) Do you REALLY think that one needs to be injured in order to have been raped? Are you saying that if she didn't fight back enough to be injured that she wasn't raped? Christ, how to respond to shit like this.

Also, where is this picture of the accuser cheering on the accused? Or is that something you simply made up?

There is utterly no need for me to provide my standard of evidence because I am not the one making comments on the accused's guilt or innocence. YOU are.