General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 40 years of college football's sexual assault problem [View all]davidn3600
(6,342 posts)I dont know enough about all those other cases to have a very good opinion on them. The information presented is by an author that has an obvious bias and is certainly not allowing the other side to defend themselves.
But are you suggesting there is some national conspiracy to not prosecute rape? That's a pretty big accusation. And it would have to be a pretty damn big conspiracy.
Rape CAN BE very difficult to prosecute. Im not talking about blatant cases of violent rape where there is no question to what's going on. Why those are not prosecuted, I can't tell you and there is something wrong with the system in those cases. I dont know what the issue is there.
But a lot of rape cases are far more difficult to reach the burden of overcoming reasonable doubt. For example, cases where both parties are plastered drunk and neither can recall much of what happened. Unless you are suggesting that men have the ultimate responsibility for any sexual activity that occurs. But I think most people would find that kind of sexist. I'll tell you this...most prosecutors in cases like that will drop the case if there is no evidence of physical trauma. First, you can't prove much if no one can really remember much. And second, technically the man also couldn't have legally consented either if his BAC is sky high. So some may argue that she's just as guilty of rape as he is. Should they both be thrown in prison?