Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here it comes: The Fast Track (TPA) freight train to shove the TPP down our throats [View all]solarhydrocan
(551 posts)78. Both (D) and (R) platforms endorse the TPP
Trans-Pacific Partnership: The biggest trade deal youve never heard of
Salon.com Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/everything_you_wanted_to_know_about_the_trans_pacific_partnership/
Why isnt trade a part of the election? After all, in 1992, Ross Perot made the last successful third-party run for the presidency, mostly on the strength of his anti-NAFTA rhetoric. Today, however, on the core question of these trade agreements, the parties basically agree. President Barack Obama has pledged to double U.S. exports as a core policy goal, and the Democratic platform lists the TPP as a historic high-standard agreement that will help accomplish this. The GOP platform pledges that a Republican President will complete negotiations for a Trans-Pacific Partnership to open rapidly developing Asian markets to U.S. products. Both party leaders argue that exports are one key to creating high-quality American jobs...more
Democratic Party Platform
http://www.democrats.org/democratic-national-platform
We remain committed to finding more markets for American-made goodsincluding using the Trans-Pacific Partnership between the United States and eight countries in the Asia-Pacific...
Republican Party Platform
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=101961
Because American workers have shown that, on a truly level playing field, they can surpass the competition in international trade, we call for the restoration of presidential Trade Promotion Authority. It will ensure up or down votes in Congress on any new trade agreements, without meddling by special interests. A Republican President will complete negotiations for a Trans-Pacific Partnership to open rapidly developing Asian markets to U.S. products. Beyond that, we envision a worldwide multilateral agreement among nations committed to the principles of open markets, what has been called a "Reagan Economic Zone," in which free trade will truly be fair trade for all concerned.
The fix was in years ago. The elite laugh at the proles, as their servants count their money.
Those expecting the Republicans to somehow block this because "they hate Obama" haven't been paying a bit of attention.
The 1% have already stolen our children's future, now they are coming for everything else. After all, recent history has shown that they can do just about anything and nobody really does anything to stop them. Right now for example presses are printing ~$80 billion dollars per month to reward crooked bankers for their gambling with our money. Few really care. There's a Super Bowl coming up.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here it comes: The Fast Track (TPA) freight train to shove the TPP down our throats [View all]
cali
Dec 2013
OP
Alas, you're wrong. There are many in the dem party in Congress who support this shit
cali
Dec 2013
#3
I am sure this will work out for the states about as well as NAFTA did. Cue the Ross Perot video.
silvershadow
Dec 2013
#5
"Bolstering the White House's position" =s bolstering special corporate interests' position.
Divernan
Dec 2013
#10
Congress is supposed to write bills that represent the people. It is so blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#73
Corporations/ALEC have been drafting bills for decades at state and federal levels.
Divernan
Dec 2013
#75
I think most people were not aware of this unless they were very involved politically, which
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#80
And Obama is so likeable - he's the pefect con man, though that idea is sickening.
polichick
Dec 2013
#25
Yep. So FDR is turning over in his grave seeing what the leader of his party is doing.
ZM90
Dec 2013
#31
"kills the sovereignty of the United States among any other nation that signs"
magical thyme
Dec 2013
#54
All trade deals need to be done right. "2/3 say greater US role in global economy
pampango
Dec 2013
#19
The question "Do you favor or oppose new trade deals?" was not in this poll but has been before.
pampango
Dec 2013
#42
Nope, not at all. Ed Schultz seems to be the only MSNBC pundit that gives a fuck, sadly. n/t
ZM90
Dec 2013
#29
Because they think the blue-dogs are the grown-ups in the room. It's tacit admission that
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2013
#38
Wait, I'm confused. Populist minimum wage speeches AND TPP at the same time?
NuclearDem
Dec 2013
#55
Still only crickets from the media and almost nobody seems to even realize this is happening.
pa28
Dec 2013
#57
Republicans work for their masters. Those masters want to see the TPP passed.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#72
I agree. The idea that the House will give Obama enhanced power in a trade agreement which they fear
pampango
Dec 2013
#77
Exactly, and TPA must explicitly grant the president power on labor and environmental issues
tritsofme
Dec 2013
#81