Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Agitated by 'Pathetic Centrists,' Progressive Populists Strike Back [View all]
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/12/07-2
Senator Elizabeth Warren. She may not run for president, but as one of the Congress' leading proponents of fighting economic inequality, her role has become increasingly important in the battle of ideas. (Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts)
Progressives on the march? Perhaps a bit premature, but a string of DC-based headlines this week suggest that the "corporate-friendly centrists" in Washington policy circles are losing the rhetorical battle when it comes to the national discussion surrounding economic populism:
Coalition of Liberals Strikes Back at Criticism From Centrist Democrats (NYT)
Centrist think tank attacks Warren, sparks major blowback (MSNBC)
Elizabeth Warren Calls Third Way 'Flatly Wrong' In Social Security Fight (Huffington Post)
Bye-bye, fake liberals: The Warren Democrats are winning! (Salon.com)
The Wall Street Journals pathetic attack on Elizabeth Warren (Salon.com)
Economic Populism Still the Rightand the WinningChoice (EPI.org)
Third Ways Anti-Populist, Anti-Warren and Deceptive Dead End (CAF)
Adding evidence to the notion that progressives are willing to go on offense against the forces of the "establishment's faux centrism"represented by former public officials, corporate-funded Beltway pundits, and the mainstays of the mainstream mediaa series of scathing attacks against the group "Third Way" have continued nearly a week after two prominent members of the group published an op-ed calling for cuts to Social Security and a rejection of the populism that is bubbling up across the nation.
In just the latest hit on the Jon Cowan and Jim Kessler op-ed that appeared in the Wall Street Journal at the beginning of the week, economist Paul Krugman called the so-called "centrism" of the 'Third Way' representatives "pathetic." Describing their arguments as intellectually bankrupt, Krugman concluded:
Its just so tired and tiring. If being a centrist means fact-free denunciations of progressives for not being willing to cut entitlements, who needs these guys?
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I had a DUer tell me that they considered right of center Democrats to be liberals. n/t
A Simple Game
Dec 2013
#15
It's not an accident that we've had our words taken from us. When words lose their meaning,
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2013
#21
it's not nearly as bad as when "prog" means "defending Reaganesque plans because a Dem did it"
MisterP
Dec 2013
#25
"There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos:.." J.H
YOHABLO
Dec 2013
#27
Centrism is the equivalent of status quo BS & is anything but democratic, it's a sham! TPP is such
mother earth
Dec 2013
#29