Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

quinnox

(20,600 posts)

12. Had trashed the thread already, just on principle, but thanks anyway

Reply to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 07:14 PM

Dec 2013

Dog threads are an 'auto-trash' for me.

But its a requirement to use a graphic warning label when posting disturbing images, too many seem to think its optional or can be done out of "being nice", they need to read the terms of service.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WARNING: There is a current thread that contains a graphic image: [View all] Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 OP

Thank you! That would have ruined my day! Happyhippychick Dec 2013 #1

I and others have asked and asked and asked people not to do that Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #2

The image is graphic. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #3

Agreed - TBF Dec 2013 #4

I am an animal lover of the first magnitude Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #5

As far as I remember he served his sentence malaise Dec 2013 #10

Sometimes people suck madokie Dec 2013 #6

Kick Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #7

thanks for the warning Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #8

I opened the thread before I saw your warning - kiva Dec 2013 #9

I don't care anything about Michael Vick lpbk2713 Dec 2013 #11

Had trashed the thread already, just on principle, but thanks anyway quinnox Dec 2013 #12

TOS. Agschmid Dec 2013 #13

Yep, it looks like they dropped that part, and said you can't post those in the first place quinnox Dec 2013 #14

I agree. Agschmid Dec 2013 #16

Ok. Would you be offended if I was offended by the graphic image represented by madinmaryland Dec 2013 #15

This has nothing to do with being "offended." Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #17

What condition are you referring to? Please explain, as I did not know what you are referring to. madinmaryland Dec 2013 #18

It's a hypersensitivity to graphic images. Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #19

Unfortunately, the jury let it stand: Ptah Dec 2013 #20

Well, thank you for whoever alerted. Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #21