Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Enough of dumb jokes, here are some intellectual jokes [View all]geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)67. Good question. I suppose the answer is that it was the nature of the original "joke".
You could say "There are whale bone types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't", but it just doesn't have the same ring to it.
Consider these two statements:
"There are 3 (three) types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't"
"There are 10 (ten) types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't"
If one reads 10 as a "ten" instead of "two", the statement has the same nonsensical character as reading 3 as "three". IMO the second half of the statement, "those who understand binary and those who don't" does not make sense in the context of ten or three types of people, but does make sense on it's own. Similarly, the first half of the statement makes sense on its own, but when used as a pre-amble for the second half of the statement its meaning becomes obscured and cannot be resolved.
"There are whale bone types of people in the world" does not make sense in any context.
The entire statement does makes sense if one reads 10 as "two".
"There are 10 (two) types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's hard to explain puns to kleptomaniacs because they always take things literally. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#5
No offense, but that places you squarely in the "doesn't understand binary" category.
Thor_MN
Dec 2013
#20
If the first and second definitions don't make sense, go with the one that makes it funny.
Thor_MN
Dec 2013
#63
If you are still scratching your coconut, 10 in binary = 2 in the base 10 system.
geckosfeet
Dec 2013
#25
Good question. I suppose the answer is that it was the nature of the original "joke".
geckosfeet
Dec 2013
#67
Welll.. I wanted to make one with Sarah Palin in it, so here's my pathetic attempt.
ananda
Dec 2013
#26
Neil deGrasse Tyson uses a variant of this joke as an example of 'not so Intelligent Design'...
DreamGypsy
Dec 2013
#58