Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(9,002 posts)

7. LOL

Mon Dec 9, 2013, 08:21 AM

Dec 2013

I clicked on this link knowing there would be people trashing Seymore.

I figured you'd be here but reply one - you're quick.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New Yorker, Washington Post Passed On Seymour Hersh Syria Report [View all] kpete Dec 2013 OP

Pretty obvious, Sy. Your sources weren't reliable Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #1

a problem with the messenger? G_j Dec 2013 #2

A (single) FORMER New Yorker fact checker frazzled Dec 2013 #5

since we didn't go to war, it's not a bombshell Enrique Dec 2013 #6

LOL Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #7

+100 nt Mojorabbit Dec 2013 #4

Which is a good reason to ignore Hersh, right? gulliver Dec 2013 #8