Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CatWoman

(80,230 posts)
72. ....
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 07:33 PM
Dec 2013

Michael Jackson Conspiracy (New Edition) is the only full account of the phenomenon that was "the Michael Jackson trial." Providing vivid details that people never saw in the news, Jones describes the accuser and his family as a band of grifters, a group of gold-diggers, who were looking for a payday in Hollywood . An intense account of what really happened in the Santa Maria courtroom, the author reveals the sham behind the allegations of accuser Gavin Arvizo, who had also "targeted" other celebrities like Chris Tucker, Jay Leno, and George Lopez, before landing the biggest fish of all: Michael Jackson. The book exposes, undeniably, why the jury found Michael Jackson NOT GUILTY on all counts, and how a media frenzy ignored the actual evidence, opting instead for ratings and sensationalism, at the expense Jackson's reputation.

http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Jackson-Conspiracy-New-Edition/dp/0615686206

The audience is transported back to 1993 and taken through the first set of allegations levelled against Jackson. Much time is dedicated to the controversial settlement of the civil suit brought by Jordan Chandler's parents. That settlement, Jones suggests, is the primary cause of many people's reservations about Jackson.

Former Jackson manager Frank Dileo says that Jackson was tricked into the settlement by business advisors more interested in the star's earning power than his public image. Thomas Mesereau, who represented Jackson in his 2005 trial, adds that the settlement also set a precedent for anybody wishing to extort money from Michael Jackson, sending the message that he was an easy target. It created an attitude, he says: 'Why work when you can just sue Michael
Jackson?'

It was Jackson's concern over the impact of the settlement on his public image, Jones claims, that inspired him to let Martin Bashir into his inner sanctum. Seduced by Bashir's promise that his documentary would centre on Jackson's quest to achieve an International Children's Holiday, the star gave Bashir unprecedented access to his life in the hope that it would vindicate him of the 1993 child abuse allegations. But Bashir manipulated the footage in order to advance his own career, Jones says. Bashir ended up crossing the pond to work as a news anchor for ABC, while the documentary Jackson hoped would vindicate him actually wound up serving as the catalyst to a second set of allegations.

Thomas Mesereau describes former DA Tom Sneddon - who tried to prosecute Jackson in 1993 and brought charges against him in 2003 - as being "obsessed to the point of absurdity". Paul Rodriguez, jury foreman in Jackson's trial, agrees. "He came across like he was just doing anything he could to pursuade us to look at things his way, regardless of the evidence," he says. "It was almost like he had a vendetta against him."

Criminal defence lawyer and celebrity trial expert Mickey Sherman adds:

"I think [the prosecution] got too emotionally invested in the case. I think Tom Sneddon seemed gleeful. Gleeful. He took a little too much pleasure in dishing out misery to Michael Jackson... There was such an eagerness to dish out some bad stuff to Michael Jackson that the credibility was, if not lost, certainly diminished."

Jones asserts that the media ignored the not guilty verdicts in Jackson's trial and continued to portray him as a predator because it made 'great headlines on the covers of rag papers'. Mesereau adds that the media was 'humiliated' by the verdicts because reporters had been predicting a conviction and 'almost salivating about him being hauled off to jail'. Jones concludes that the trial traumatised Jackson to such an extent that he was unable to sleep, and this is why he died of a propofol overdose last summer.

http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com/2010/04/preview-true-crime-with-aphrodite-jones.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

One of them was actually punished for his crimes. CBGLuthier Dec 2013 #1
...... CatWoman Dec 2013 #4
Nope, nothing sinister here XemaSab Dec 2013 #8
might not be sinister CatWoman Dec 2013 #13
He only paid 20 million in the 90's Politicalboi Dec 2013 #29
Aphrodite Jones Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #126
wtf are you laughing at? Someone's name? KittyWampus Dec 2013 #130
Oi Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #133
Do rape victims ever get to "let it go"? Your OP is offensive. KurtNYC Dec 2013 #137
Michael Jackson fucked little boys. zappaman Dec 2013 #140
Are you talking about Jackson, or Polanski? arcane1 Dec 2013 #77
Hmmmm. Well Michael Vick i don't think too much about because i don't like sports much el_bryanto Dec 2013 #2
Looks like you've proven your point! marsis Dec 2013 #3
I don't understand your post CatWoman Dec 2013 #5
What's not to understand. marsis Dec 2013 #17
lol CatWoman Dec 2013 #19
See whay you've done marsis Dec 2013 #85
If Bill Clinton had 12-yo girls over to his house and shared a bed with them XemaSab Dec 2013 #6
damn, that's kinda harsh CatWoman Dec 2013 #9
So you don't have a problem with a grown man XemaSab Dec 2013 #16
Uhhh, I don't think.... Blus4u Dec 2013 #129
There is no evidence Michael Jackson ever hurt a single child. n/t cynatnite Dec 2013 #12
This ^^ kiva Dec 2013 #14
! i know i'm going to hell, but the mental imagine of jimmeh running a dogfighting ring out back of dionysus Dec 2013 #87
Nailed it. n/t TroglodyteScholar Dec 2013 #124
You are right about Michael Jackson, Catwoman. Whisp Dec 2013 #7
So you think it's normal for a grown man to sleep with boys? lunamagica Dec 2013 #88
push off. Whisp Dec 2013 #92
No, of course not. That's the thing. On the one hand, I don't doubt Jackson behaved inappropriately nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #98
Michael Vick, unlike little-boy fucker Michael Jackson, actually served time. zappaman Dec 2013 #10
I think I threw up over your entire post CatWoman Dec 2013 #15
Let's not forget dangling a baby outside a hotel window. Rex Dec 2013 #18
Imagine being so enthralled by a celebrity zappaman Dec 2013 #31
I hear that, I will defend some crazy things but I do draw a line Rex Dec 2013 #40
Exactly...nobody cared. zappaman Dec 2013 #43
to the contrary, many were upset/outraged about the baby dangling incident CatWoman Dec 2013 #45
Nobody cared..who was close to him. zappaman Dec 2013 #47
Oh, that freaked me out. HappyMe Dec 2013 #50
I agree, he decided to crawl into bed. Rex Dec 2013 #48
actually CatWoman Dec 2013 #44
It's okay. zappaman Dec 2013 #46
Someone drank their Haterade this morning. Initech Dec 2013 #55
Ya got me! zappaman Dec 2013 #57
I do too. Initech Dec 2013 #58
... zappaman Dec 2013 #63
.... CatWoman Dec 2013 #72
... Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #97
I believe Aphrodite Jones and her book Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #135
Has Aphrodite Jones seen MJ's cock? XemaSab Dec 2013 #136
Is it bigger than a bread box? Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #138
If it was a shakedown XemaSab Dec 2013 #141
LOL CatWoman Dec 2013 #59
Sometimes it suits people to not let go. It helps them keep their moral high ground... cynatnite Dec 2013 #11
I'm not in a position to forgive either one, as neither did anything to me. It's up to their victims LanternWaste Dec 2013 #20
One was actually proven guilty, the other one wasn't and was trashed duffyduff Dec 2013 #21
one was found guilty, served time and still being trashed CatWoman Dec 2013 #23
Well, Vick actually did what he was accused of Scootaloo Dec 2013 #27
Michael Jackson is dead, so there isn't much HappyMe Dec 2013 #22
there are two huge threads on the subject CatWoman Dec 2013 #24
What? HappyMe Dec 2013 #25
LOL CatWoman Dec 2013 #34
No harm, no foul. HappyMe Dec 2013 #38
Just because someone served their time NuclearDem Dec 2013 #26
^^^ this ^^^ TDale313 Dec 2013 #61
... yes.... but you don't do EVERYTHING because you're obliged to, do you? sibelian Dec 2013 #86
Neither am I. 840high Dec 2013 #108
much too-do about nothing here... Bennyboy Dec 2013 #28
and you also started the thread about the black heros CatWoman Dec 2013 #35
+1 and thanks for the thread.... jaysunb Dec 2013 #49
You remind me of a guy I saw at a concert joeglow3 Dec 2013 #79
UGH! Texasgal Dec 2013 #30
I wasn't aware I was telling you you couldn't have an opinion CatWoman Dec 2013 #36
well thank you for that. Texasgal Dec 2013 #42
Dave Chappell sums it up Politicalboi Dec 2013 #32
+1 Go Vols Dec 2013 #94
Both POSs because of their actions bigwillq Dec 2013 #33
Let it go or else! trumad Dec 2013 #37
Yay! A fresh outrage! HappyMe Dec 2013 #39
hey baby CatWoman Dec 2013 #73
Come on! Be reasonable. Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2013 #41
It's an issue of maturity and grace ... 1000words Dec 2013 #51
What a load of apologist crap TheSarcastinator Dec 2013 #52
wow, dude... Blus4u Dec 2013 #132
Yeah, JimboBillyBubbaBob Dec 2013 #53
I've always been torn on Michael Jackson LittleBlue Dec 2013 #54
Whatever the truth was, there, MJ was a perfect example of what happens when you Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #69
Probably one of the best analyses I've seen of the "Jackson problem"... nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #99
Excuse me if im not ok with ANIMAL ABUSE!! darkangel218 Dec 2013 #56
I am not ok with animal abuse either CatWoman Dec 2013 #62
we're expressing dislike for Texasgal Dec 2013 #64
Sometimes I just don't like somebody mokawanis Dec 2013 #60
i don't really care about people who think he is what you said Bodhi BloodWave Dec 2013 #95
You make a good point mokawanis Dec 2013 #101
Anything to do with them both being black and rich? HipChick Dec 2013 #65
yes, but i wouldn't put Jackson and Vick in the same category as i don't think JAckson JI7 Dec 2013 #66
You can tell a lot about a person from their obsessions. nt MrScorpio Dec 2013 #67
+1 On the Road Dec 2013 #128
It seems to me, in the case of Michael Jackson, to be pretty much either/or. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #68
Michael Jackson was not a pedophile Skittles Dec 2013 #70
Have you read the list of all the porn found at his home and entered into evidence? lunamagica Dec 2013 #90
not getting into this Skittles Dec 2013 #106
And what normal pipi_k Dec 2013 #111
Yeah, boys go wild for kiddie porn...perfectly normal...sure lunamagica Dec 2013 #112
Wouldn't he have been arrested if that was true? nt U4ikLefty Dec 2013 #119
It is true. The evidence was filed. I guess you missed the link lunamagica Dec 2013 #131
Interestingly enough it's also pedophilia-grooming-like Major Nikon Dec 2013 #118
I set a personal record in yesterday's thread Jamaal510 Dec 2013 #71
word CatWoman Dec 2013 #74
Nothing stevil Dec 2013 #81
No, Dorian Gray Dec 2013 #107
I'm kicking this because it's the goofiest goddamn thing I've ever read, and I believe in sharing. LeftyMom Dec 2013 #75
One was a man having little boys sleep over in his bed and the other tortured animals for fun Marrah_G Dec 2013 #76
Kobe Bryant is still a rapist. nt Deep13 Dec 2013 #78
Michael Jackson has been dead for LibDemAlways Dec 2013 #80
Perhaps you should ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #82
ITA!!!!! mfcorey1 Dec 2013 #83
I really don't know much about the Michael Jackson thing. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #84
here's the evidence found at his home lunamagica Dec 2013 #89
Just because he had a house full of pictures of naked children XemaSab Dec 2013 #96
Let's be honest... zappaman Dec 2013 #100
Why, just today I was straightening the cushions of the couch and I found a stack of kiddie porn! XemaSab Dec 2013 #105
Wow, that is damning Beringia Dec 2013 #104
DUers certainly seem more willing to forgive Ted Kennedy for Chappaquiddick Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #91
Honestly, I don't care about Vick. Deep13 Dec 2013 #93
Perhaps that's because Byrd & Kennedy expressed real remorse & lived their lives in catbyte Dec 2013 #116
"Michael Vick to work with Humane Society on its campaign against dogfighting" Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #122
And how long did that last? (Insert eye roll here) catbyte Dec 2013 #134
They can both rot. MirrorAshes Dec 2013 #102
Well said malaise Dec 2013 #103
It doesn't bother me 840high Dec 2013 #110
Sell that shit to the dogs and the rescuers involved. flvegan Dec 2013 #109
I agree Beringia Dec 2013 #113
+1000 CrawlingChaos Dec 2013 #114
Sorry, CatWoman, but Vick was immersed in a long standing ring of horrific animal abuse catbyte Dec 2013 #115
Michael Jackson and Michael Vick were both disgusting human beings. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #117
My husband has worked with abused and neglected dogs for years. a la izquierda Dec 2013 #120
There's a difference pecwae Dec 2013 #121
I would love to know exactly why we should be expected to "let shit go". Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #123
This is just my opinion on MJ and MV7! Tim4319 Dec 2013 #125
Justice has no time limit StarrGazerr Dec 2013 #127
Nobody really knows if MJ was a child molester OwnedByCats Dec 2013 #139
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Jackson and Micha...»Reply #72