Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fourth Porn Actor this Year - Tests HIV+ [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)151. Respectfully, I must disagree.
There's a big difference between an economic, employer-employee setting vs private affairs.
Every place that has legalized prostitution/brothels makes their usage mandatory. How is this different?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
is it illegal to require chicken processors to wear rubber gloves or cooks to wear hair nets?
KittyWampus
Dec 2013
#144
But they are paid employees working for a corporation. Amazing how some DU'ers
KittyWampus
Dec 2013
#154
Well, no thinking person has ever said that, but I've seen it said here on DU. Kind of a lot.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#5
That may be, but it would reduce the chance of passing it on the set, so it does matter
lostincalifornia
Dec 2013
#74
"As long as you can whack off you don't give a fuck about worker protection?"
DontTreadOnMe
Dec 2013
#114
What I am reading seems to say the hell with their health, they generate BILLIONS!!! IN REVENUE NT
Mojorabbit
Dec 2013
#83
Control what you can, not what you can't. This is a public health issue in a specific industry, and
lostincalifornia
Dec 2013
#75
How Republican of you… lets not regulate business because they'll move. You didn't think through
KittyWampus
Dec 2013
#145
We're on an internet message board. Everyone knows everything about everything.
Vashta Nerada
Dec 2013
#11
you changed the topic a third time... do you own stock in condom companies?
DontTreadOnMe
Dec 2013
#106
No I am not a porn producer, and I am also not ignorant about stupid laws
DontTreadOnMe
Dec 2013
#111
FACT: Individual humans don't always abide by rules/regulations but government has an interest
KittyWampus
Dec 2013
#146
FACT: They could have been infected for some time before their tests were positive
Ino
Dec 2013
#165
They also don't suggest, ask, persuade or convince people in porn to wear a condom.
William769
Dec 2013
#49
re: 'Employers have an obligation to protect the health and safety of their employees. "
DontTreadOnMe
Dec 2013
#50
Yeah, if OSHA has that right, why haven't they made porn stars wear condoms?
Vashta Nerada
Dec 2013
#73
It really bothers you that some people like to have sex w/o a condom, doesn't it?
Vashta Nerada
Dec 2013
#169
I don't think you could create a law which would successfully enforce safe sex for porn workers.
Agschmid
Dec 2013
#171
Let's go all the way & save a child, Mandatory birth control in the porn industry.
William769
Dec 2013
#66
Until recently there was a nonprofit in Hollywood which gave std testing to adult entertainers.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#37
Firemen need to wear turnout gear, cops need yo wear body armor, miners need to have lanterns,
AuntFester
Dec 2013
#94