Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

haele

(15,680 posts)
25. When access to opportunity and power is race-neutral, then you might, might
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 02:59 PM
Dec 2013

have a reason to bring up that question.

We are currently in the phase where race and prejudice is being discussed and recognized, not that "the problem is fixed". Just because there are more "black people" in power, or who have made a lot of money, does not mean that the promise land has been reached.
There are also more blacks in prison, and blacks are being profiled, stopped, frisked, and suspected in greater numbers than previously - just as they are beginning to step out into the greater public instead of being relegated to red-lined neighborhoods and segregated out of sunset towns and do not have the same perception of social worth that those who have lived within the existing society of those communities receive on a daily basis. The newcomer is "the other", the red-headed stepchild, the bumpkin who is a leach diminishing local resources because they have "a different culture they don't want to change to fit in", or "their families haven't paid their dues like the generations living there before them" or some other such nonsense. While under the law, race relations have gotten better -but socially in some areas, it is getting worse as some people who already have privilege are afraid of losing their own status or money if they are forced "to share".

The classic race problem is still opportunity for advancement or positions. Nobody wants to think they didn't have enough skills and "lost" in a competition for a job or a school slot where there are a large number of applicants, including minority representatives, competing for the same position. So if the minority gets the work, it's assumed that it's gotta be because of "race" or "quotas" - "you're just as (or maybe more) qualified as that other guy, but they got picked because they looked different than you" - instead accepting that it was a weighed business or educational decision that always has a lot of other factors involved than just race or quotas.
In my experience, unless it's a completely blind hire or advancement, when someone in a "majority" racial or gender class is "passed over" for a position and a minority gets the job, that person rarely ever questions their own status or capabilities - or the organization that made the final decision - because the minority sticks out like a sore thumb, no matter how qualified they are. It's gotta be the race (or gender, or religion), because that's the "only difference".

There is still a great prejudice - a pre-judging - based on race, color, and class, both within American society and within the black community itself, as the black middle class is disappearing at a greater rate than the white middle class. The pendulums of reaction and backlash need to be addressed and mitigated before you can say "NAACP - keep it or kill it?"

The NAACP will either evolve or disappear naturally as the issues of race equality, opportunity, and accessibility evolve themselves.

Haele

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I dream for the day madokie Dec 2013 #1
Having been searching for employment lately MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #7
But I would hope that you realize ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #35
Yeah and employers would know that too gollygee Dec 2013 #37
Only for EEO tracking purposes ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #41
Don't care, I choose not to identify. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #46
Why deliberately handicap yourself? ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #50
It's not a handicap. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #51
Yes it is ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #52
Disclosing may give you a better case if there is actual discrimination going on. rucky Dec 2013 #62
Thanks Nitram Dec 2013 #2
The best answer DamnYankeeInHouston Dec 2013 #3
Disagree to an extent JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #5
I think some whites fear that they will be treated poorly alfredo Dec 2013 #6
Shows you where their hearts are at JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #9
Call it fear of karma. alfredo Dec 2013 #19
In the words of Momma 1SBM ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #36
My daughter, a teacher, was asked the other day if she was prejudiced Frustratedlady Dec 2013 #4
NAACP........keep it or kill it ? curious how you respond. NM_Birder Dec 2013 #8
What do you think? JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #10
I think the NAACP needs to go away. NM_Birder Dec 2013 #14
Do you mind me asking JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #16
By "one of you"...... NM_Birder Dec 2013 #27
It does JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #29
That was a disertation ? NM_Birder Dec 2013 #32
Nope JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #33
The "notion of 'inequality'" continues to be more than a notion. M0rpheus Dec 2013 #17
Then you just answered why the little race bubbles NEED to be filled out as mentioned in the OP. NM_Birder Dec 2013 #31
I hope I am misreading this ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #40
I assume nothing. M0rpheus Dec 2013 #44
Magnificent Number23 Dec 2013 #48
You need to read this post gollygee Dec 2013 #20
Because ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #38
"all help to keep the notion of "inequality" alive and well." because inequality is alive and well. seabeyond Dec 2013 #65
Very interesting you didn't mention the NRA. NCTraveler Dec 2013 #70
What bullshit. They exist because inequality is alive and well. It's not a "notion." marmar Dec 2013 #71
Inequality is more than just a "notion." (nt) Heidi Dec 2013 #72
Wow. That's a cryptic response. gollygee Dec 2013 #11
read above. NM_Birder Dec 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Dec 2013 #58
Definitely read the poster's response JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #18
It's an argument that literally makes no sense. As if ignoring racism will somehow make it vanish. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #64
What kind of question is that? curious how you respond. Glassunion Dec 2013 #12
I can't answer that. LWolf Dec 2013 #13
as a subscriber to the Nation and Mother Jones and donor to PFAW hfojvt Dec 2013 #21
Colored people JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #22
my reaction wasn't as nice as your's -- so i refrained. nt xchrom Dec 2013 #23
Hey JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #24
not my normal term hfojvt Dec 2013 #28
You are correct JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #30
That remark takes me back to an episode of ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #42
was he actually robbed hfojvt Dec 2013 #53
I really don't recall ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #63
Lol! JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #60
I suspect ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #34
I didn't actually say it was a raced base decision hfojvt Dec 2013 #54
Maybe it was your sparkling personality, so often on display here for us at DU. nt. Starry Messenger Dec 2013 #45
say what? I am a nice guy, really. hfojvt Dec 2013 #56
So, let me see if I understand you correctly. Glassunion Dec 2013 #47
my personality is not broken hfojvt Dec 2013 #57
Then would you say that the problems was not so much the personality, Glassunion Dec 2013 #66
probably his supervisor had far more hiring authority hfojvt Dec 2013 #67
So a couple of African American men get a job and you don't gollygee Dec 2013 #68
I didn't say anything about the whole hfojvt Dec 2013 #69
"So I declined." Thank God. Number23 Dec 2013 #49
Well I am a patron here hfojvt Dec 2013 #55
When access to opportunity and power is race-neutral, then you might, might haele Dec 2013 #25
+100 JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #26
Well Put! n/t 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #43
So three out of four of your grandparents were white? pnwmom Dec 2013 #59
Pretending racism doesn't exist does no one any favors. Even white people, ultimately. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #61
Nicely written and appreciated. I understand completely. kelliekat44 Dec 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Passed for White and St...»Reply #25