Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Prostitution: why Swedes believe they got it right (targeting the men who pay for sex) [View all]LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)165. .
Why would we reject patriarchy in one context but argue for its continuance in another?
I don't know. You're the one suggesting it be continued, you'd have to tell me.
We have not rejected marriage. As I pointed out, we did not criminalize marriage or jail men for marrying women, or call women incompetent for marrying men. We gave women equal power within the institution and access to legal services, and criminalized abusive behaviors within the institution, changed the institutional power structure, in fact, without banning the institution itself or sanctioning the people who participate in it. Pretty much what I'm suggesting ought to happen with prostitution.
What do you reckon would happen if we suggested criminalizing weddings, and jailing any man who marries a woman?
Sexuality, male and female, is a gift, an essential human experience. It is profaned by turning it into a commodity. There is nothing misogynistic about that recognizing that simple truth. Turning any human experience and turning it into a product is profane.
Purity culture bullshit. Essential human experience, yes. "Gift" that is "profaned" when used outside your personal social norm, no. That's the ideology behind every slut-shamer in existence.
And there it is. Regulation exists to protect the men from the women, with no such measures to protect the women from the men.
JFC. The same measures that protect the customers also protect the workers. That's what condom laws are for- minimizing the risk of disease transmission, the same reason your doctor wears gloves. You insist on safety regulations for the sex industry, then you piss and moan about the regulations because they are also protecting people you don't like.
Also, you're still stuck in Heteronormativille on the planet Misogyny. Hey, guess what? Male prostitutes exist! They face the exact same health hazards that we women do, doing the same fucking job, taking the same risks for the same money. They even do that same yucky thing with the penis and the mouth that you seem to have so many issues with. If the local Firefighter's Union announced a program of special protections and concerns for male firefighters because there's more men in the industry, you'd be howling like a herd of coyotes. That's how I feel about you right now. If you're going to pretend you actually care about workers, then care about all of them. Not just the inferior wimmenz who need your superior male guidance. All of them. If you're not going to bother to do that, don't bother responding, because I actually do care about them all.
Bonus story from Sweden, where sex work is considered violence against women:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/12/swedish-study-male-sex-workers-twice-as-prevalent-as-female-ones/
Being available on demand is not the same thing as being free. I have video on demand through the cable box. It is not free.
You still have to pay for it and the cable company has to agree to provide it. If your credit's bad or you don't pay them, they won't. You can "demand" it all day long, but you won't get it without you paying them, and them agreeing to give it to you. You're not entitled to it by right. That actually is a pretty good analogy, although I doubt you meant it that way. Hopefully it hasn't "profaned" your viewing experience.
Very cute trick, citing a link from the pimps' lobby regarding Germany's experience with trafficking.
There was a direct link to the German federal police website included in the article, but the report was scrubbed. The numbers weren't made up, if that's what you're trying to imply.
The Rights Work Initiative.
The Rights Work Initiative a project of the Program on Human Trafficking and Forced Labor at the American University Washington College of Laws Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law.
Addressing human trafficking and forced labor through independent research and debate.
The Rights Work Initiative a project of the Program on Human Trafficking and Forced Labor at the American University Washington College of Laws Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law.
Addressing human trafficking and forced labor through independent research and debate.
This is the "pimp" in charge. Her name is Ann Jordan. She moonlights as an attorney specializing in anti-trafficking efforts, when she's not pimpin'.
I'd like to know what about that says "pimp's lobby" to you, I really would. Nice try. But as usual, a fail.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
174 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Prostitution: why Swedes believe they got it right (targeting the men who pay for sex) [View all]
pampango
Dec 2013
OP
No 'they' didn't. Reagan gave amnesty to the illegals in '86 and it didn't work then,
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2013
#103
they also have an escalation of sex slave trafficking and the prostitutes are abused as much if not
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#11
germany, ireland, france, australia and even amsterdamn are all looking to shift. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#63
really clever people. i am sure they are. why would you think they are not? they tried
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#68
that was really hitting it out in left field with a couple wild pitches in my direction. whatever
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#76
people differ on the view. i am not buying one way or another. i think most people are feeling the
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#88
What two consenting adults do in private should be left private, including trading sex for money.
lightcameron
Dec 2013
#5
yet, you can only stomach the conversation when it is nicely wrapped up in the "pretty woman",
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#12
and this would be the illusion wyou create that you can only narrowly define it in such a manner
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#25
no. you did not get to the "heart of the matter". you swung and missed. but, a predictable
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#27
"pretty woman" seems to be all you hold near and dear in the huge scope of the issue, cameron.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#29
lol. wowser. whatevah. stay with pretty woman, then you can digest the abuse, the trafficking,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#31
Yep. There's a reason that most of the prostitutes in Germany and Amsterdam are foreign nationals.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#108
Much as the phrase "consenting adults" in these discussions means "I have a right to pay for sex..."
LanternWaste
Dec 2013
#140
Prostitution is not consent. You have a weird notion about what "consent" is.
duffyduff
Dec 2013
#20
"If "civil libertarians" are ever right about a goddamned thing it would be a miracle."
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Dec 2013
#32
Lower-tier prostitutes don't do particularly better than walmart workers. It's the same system
El_Johns
Dec 2013
#41
Because wearing a cheesy blue vest and stocking shelves is not as degrading
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#52
It's a good way to fill in employment gaps on a resume/application when you're working
LadyHawkAZ
Dec 2013
#74
ok. probably more efficient putting prostitute than homemaker. but.. ok. thanks. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#77
Heh, you go on telling yourself that defending an institition created to serve men
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#148
People can be primarily liberal and still have gender biases that are extreme right-wing
LadyHawkAZ
Dec 2013
#163
Hey, if you think I'm misogynist for disliking men who wank to rape porn . . .
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#173
Those things could happen, but don't see how you could consider it at all comparable
treestar
Dec 2013
#155
You also don't think anyone can consent to have sex in front of a camera, right?
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#43
So, you're saying that people with financial pressures and/or drug addiction shouldn't be allowed to
EOTE
Dec 2013
#127
There are prostitutes who aren't on any drugs and enjoy getting paid for sex.
phleshdef
Dec 2013
#168
a) That's simply not true, and b) if it were true, it would be a reason *not* to ban prostitution.
Donald Ian Rankin
Dec 2013
#15
(a) they aren't eligible for unemployment; (b) demand reduction is part of the
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#16
At most, "follow, if and when that has succeeded", not "be joined to". N.T.
Donald Ian Rankin
Dec 2013
#112
My elderly relatives told me that prostitution grew in their farming town during the Depression &
El_Johns
Dec 2013
#36
The Socialists in France who championed the bill there did a wonderful job defending it.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#17
That is the inevitable end to this path. None of the nations did what they did
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2013
#104
Ugh, you must have a really low opinion of men. This is what real misandry looks like.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#45
if it's economic activity the government is perfectly justified in regulating
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#171
Your call. Deliberately distorting Guttmacher's research conclusions for your own agenda
riderinthestorm
Dec 2013
#160
You can extend that argument as far as you like and the results will remain exactly the same.
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2013
#106
"Trafficking" has become synonymous in the public mind with "sex trafficking",
LadyHawkAZ
Dec 2013
#149
So I'm not allowed to reference a study authored by two feminists because you said so?
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#60
good analogy about forcing desert down someones throat cause they "appear" as if maybe they really
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#64
he validates family members being sexually involved and he promotes rape. now was how many decades
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#87
We have forgotten that before we began calling this date rape and date fraud, we called it exciting.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#93
you are saying those are not actual quotes out of the book? that these words are not being read by
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#97
ok. i am not gonna read all that garbage trying to find out how it is game set match when i quote
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#99
Had you ever asked me my thoughts on the subject you might find they align quite well with yours
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#101
You're the one digging in and defending someone explicitly arguing to legalize rape
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#119
You're linking to a wikipedia page instead of trying to defend that language.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#134
Why should I bother spending time debunking your baseless accusations when that's already been done?
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#153
That you consider legalizing date rape a rational argument says enough. nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#118
Just throwing out there that many USA state statutes criminalize the acts of soliciting prostitution
Johonny
Dec 2013
#50
There's a big difference between fucking someone and getting fucked in capitalism
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#59
I can't think of one instance where banning the vices of consenting adults has worked
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#111