Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sandyshoes17

(657 posts)
10. So true
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 10:19 PM
Dec 2013

You just read my mind. Was just going to post the same creepy. All week I have been watching shows saying in the same segment , that people who get layed off after 55 the chances of finding another job are slim, than they go into "entitlement cuts and raising the retirement age. Are you kidding me. People cannot get work at 55, so let's up the retirement age. I know republicans are in some alternate universe, but this takes the cake . They have to deal with the world we have now. Manufacturing jobs have been shipped out, the internet is killing a lot , greed etc. we need to deal with the economy in this country in the 21 century. This is our reality, they need to make serious changes to our system. Things have changed we have to adapt to the times. They don't want to create jobs, plus they want to cut off any benefits to those who don't have one. They are making laws from the 70's but we are here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That has about as much chance of happening as me becoming doc03 Dec 2013 #1
Right. In_The_Wind Dec 2013 #2
That's what they told FDR. CK_John Dec 2013 #3
We don't have FDR or his congress n/t doc03 Dec 2013 #4
Then it's our job to send reps to the next Congress that can do it. CK_John Dec 2013 #6
I think the ACA has pretty much eliminated that doc03 Dec 2013 #23
Just FYI, SSI is disability for the poor/those who don't qualify for Social Security disability. El_Johns Dec 2013 #5
I meant regular SS, will edit. CK_John Dec 2013 #7
Thanks. I wouldn't have corrected you but that people get the two mixed up & then you get El_Johns Dec 2013 #9
That should be a long way down the list of spending priorities, frankly. Donald Ian Rankin Dec 2013 #8
The real problem is Cyber era productivity can not produce enough jobs. CK_John Dec 2013 #11
Unfortunately, the conservatives already have that one figured out. Archaic Dec 2013 #16
You raise legitimate concerns. JDPriestly Dec 2013 #17
So true sandyshoes17 Dec 2013 #10
45 is about to be the new 55. Archaic Dec 2013 #15
K&R! Phlem Dec 2013 #12
rec'd and agreed.... mike_c Dec 2013 #13
I work with a ton of people holding on for dear life Archaic Dec 2013 #14
If I took Social Security now, I'd be impoverished for life Lydia Leftcoast Dec 2013 #18
My folks are in the same spot from the SocSec point. Archaic Dec 2013 #19
K & R AzDar Dec 2013 #20
Damn right! n/t ReRe Dec 2013 #21
I call TOTAL Bullshit. Coyotl Dec 2013 #22
This is certainly true. Enthusiast Dec 2013 #27
Good idea RobertEarl Dec 2013 #24
Money at the national level(any nation) is a concept. It appear when needed such CK_John Dec 2013 #25
SS has been funding the government RobertEarl Dec 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's time. Soc Sec needs ...»Reply #10