Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WA State Charter Schools ruled unconstitutional [View all]frazzled
(18,402 posts)51. The schools weren't ruled unconstitutional
In fact, it was kind of the opposite. They just can't receive state construction funds. But the suit against the new law failed in its attempt to rescind the law as unconstitutional. Here's the statement from the Attorney General of Washington State:
SEATTLE King County Superior Court Judge Jean Rietschel today issued a ruling that the states 2012 charter schools initiative may continue to be implemented.
The judge upheld the charter schools law, as written, against multiple constitutional arguments, finding that only one limited aspect of the law should be stricken.
In her ruling, Rietschel found it unconstitutional to designate a charter school as a common school. Under her ruling, charter schools could be ineligible for certain limited funding sources reserved exclusively for common schools.
Rietschel upheld the initiative, as written, against all other challenges, leaving the vast majority of the law intact.
As attorney general, it is my job to defend the will of the voters, Attorney General Bob Ferguson said. The court has held the vast majority of the charter schools initiative constitutional, and the state will continue to implement this law.
http://www.atg.wa.gov/pressrelease.aspx?id=31567#.UqyF3xy-PnQ
The judge upheld the charter schools law, as written, against multiple constitutional arguments, finding that only one limited aspect of the law should be stricken.
In her ruling, Rietschel found it unconstitutional to designate a charter school as a common school. Under her ruling, charter schools could be ineligible for certain limited funding sources reserved exclusively for common schools.
Rietschel upheld the initiative, as written, against all other challenges, leaving the vast majority of the law intact.
As attorney general, it is my job to defend the will of the voters, Attorney General Bob Ferguson said. The court has held the vast majority of the charter schools initiative constitutional, and the state will continue to implement this law.
http://www.atg.wa.gov/pressrelease.aspx?id=31567#.UqyF3xy-PnQ
I have no opinion on this, because I haven't read up on what the new WA law establishing a charter school system consists of.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I appreciate your explanation, unlike the other poster. However, I would be very surprised
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#21
Paying is often not necessary, but your observation about behavior problems is accurate. Also
Squinch
Dec 2013
#25
Well said and thank you. This IS the "Charter School" truth in my experience and research.
mountain grammy
Dec 2013
#52
Charter schools don't already exist in WA. They were voted in through a recent initiative
El_Johns
Dec 2013
#33