Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WA State Charter Schools ruled unconstitutional [View all]VPStoltz
(1,295 posts)54. This sure is a way to massage the message...
That is no "limited aspect." Common schools are what are referred to in the constitution. And if the judge found Charter Schools to be not "common schools" wouldn't that mean pretty much nothing in the constitution refers to them
But Gates, and Oprah, and Zuckerberg, and the rest will pump in the funds to challenge this.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I appreciate your explanation, unlike the other poster. However, I would be very surprised
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#21
Paying is often not necessary, but your observation about behavior problems is accurate. Also
Squinch
Dec 2013
#25
Well said and thank you. This IS the "Charter School" truth in my experience and research.
mountain grammy
Dec 2013
#52
Charter schools don't already exist in WA. They were voted in through a recent initiative
El_Johns
Dec 2013
#33