Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Test links Winston's (Heisman trophy winner) DNA to accuser [View all]
Thanks to NYC_Skp for finding this article.
Not quite he said she said. There was also a medical report showing bruises and wounds on the victims body. And another article posted on DU earlier this week said that a team mate of Winston's deleted a video of the alleged assault.
November, 20, 2013
NOV 20
11:50
PM ET
By Mark Schlabach | ESPN.com
RECOMMEND600TWEET257COMMENTS51EMAILPRINT
TALLAHASSEE -- A DNA analysis completed by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement on Tuesday confirmed that DNA provided by Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston matched the sample taken from the underwear of a woman who has accused him of sexual battery.
According to the DNA analysis report, a copy of which was viewed by ESPN.com on Wednesday, the Florida state crime lab determined that the chances of the DNA in the woman's underwear are a match for someone other than Winston was one in 2.2 trillion.
Police obtained a sexual assault kit on Dec. 7, 2012, when the accuser reported the alleged incident had occurred at an off-campus apartment. Winston's DNA was recently obtained through a buccal swab he provided to authorities investigating the case.
The DNA match alone does not prove that Winston, a leading Heisman Trophy candidate, sexually assaulted the woman, as the accuser's family claimed in a statement released by a Tampa-based attorney on Wednesday. But it does indicate that Winston, who has yet to talk to Tallahassee police or the state attorney investigating the case, had his DNA associated with the accuser on Dec. 7, 2012, when the accuser claimed she was sexually assaulted at an off-campus apartment.
http://espn.go.com/blog/acc/post/_/id/63665/test-winstons-dna-matches-accuser
150 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The first sign is she doesn't say No. And the drunk ones are tricky, I usually stay away
Blanket Statements
Dec 2013
#43
Always stay away if a potential sex partner is impaired, even in the slightest way. nt
bluestate10
Dec 2013
#111
Ahhhh...so I should assume every woman is being raped until they tell me they consented?
Blanket Statements
Dec 2013
#50
I never assume the right to have sex with anyone. You can't even keep your posts straight
Blanket Statements
Dec 2013
#55
Actually you weren't. You experience and any other woman's experience is irrelevant
Blanket Statements
Dec 2013
#24
Oh so you think Winston is guilty because of the facts in other rape cases
Blanket Statements
Dec 2013
#37
I don't know if it was rape or not, but I can understand the confusing evidence is a problem.
Sancho
Dec 2013
#103
One of the friends videotaped some of the incident, then deleted the video and discarded the
LisaL
Dec 2013
#121
I've re-read your post five times now... can't find the word "sullied". Point it out for me? n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#107
OJ Simpson won the Heisman legitimately. He became a douche years later. nt
bluestate10
Dec 2013
#112
This article is three weeks old and was written before the police decided that they wouldn't file
Chakab
Dec 2013
#61
And had he gone to trial and walked, you'd still claim he was a rapist
Blanket Statements
Dec 2013
#72
You've already judged, so stop pointing fingers. You've judged without hearing a single argument
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2013
#110
When the internet decides a person is guilty, a jury's decision isn't enough
Penicilino
Dec 2013
#74
That information is old information. It was known by law enforcement. Because a person's
bluestate10
Dec 2013
#108