9 HOURS in and Healthcare.gov still wont let me look at the actual PLANS

[Jim Lane]

92. I don't understand your reference to "unverifiable"

I gather that the next DUer who applies should have two witnesses (not immediate family members) in the room with him or her at the start of the process. These witnesses should note when the effort begins, when it ends, and what the results were. They should report their findings in sworn affidavits, which will be notarized. Any post complaining about any ACA difficulty must include the PDF of each affidavit, along with each witness's full name, address, telephone number, and email address, so that the reports can be verified.

Is your position that you'll ignore any post that doesn't meet these requirements?

The serious point is that, in the context of an internet message board, "unverifiable" is a fairly odd criticism. I for one am prepared to believe that someone like Demo Chris, with more than 4,000 posts, is not a Limbaughite who's put that much effort into setting up a DU persona just to pave the way for lying about Healthcare.gov problems. I'm especially prepared to believe it when this admittedly "unverifiable" account is completely consistent with what many other people have reported.