Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
62. They didn't just release "anything and everything".
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 02:59 AM
Dec 2013

According to this article and others I've read, all of the documents are meticulously archived, and strictly vetted and redacted. Snowden has maintained all along, that his goal was to provide transparency, while making certain that no one but he was implicated in the theft of the documents, and that no legitimate intelligence sources were jeopardized. The only place I hear the claim that he released documents willy-nilly, is from his most strident detractors, and they can never produce evidence that anyone was physically harmed by their release.

A lot of people have made a seriously flawed cost/benefit analysis, in trading a portion of their liberty, in exchange for perceived security. Most terrorism experts, the world over, say that the Global War on Terror actually decreases security, by increasing the probability of a successful terrorist attacks. It also sets a bad example to other countries, who might now believe that they too, have a right to act unilaterally and preemptively in attacking others, in clear violation of international law. It also provokes greater distrust among countries who might be skeptical of the motives of the US, thereby increasing the general level of tension and hostility in the world, right at the very moment when we, more than at any other time, need to be cooperating to secure the long-term future of our civilization and even our species.

And that is on top of the fact that the threat from terrorism is minuscule, to begin with. There is NO WAY, that the actual physical threat from terrorism, merits the tremendous amount of resources and energy devoted to a Global War on Terror. You are tens of thousands of times more likely to die from heart disease or cancer or from a plane crash that doesn't involve terrorism.

The resources wasted on the GWOT would be better served developing alternative sources of energy that wont destroy our biosphere.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Exactly. Angry and alienated. gulliver Dec 2013 #1
But they are heros now. The public is seeing what the NSA is actually doing. It opened many eyes! nt Logical Dec 2013 #2
So the public now sees what Facebook, Google, etc. are now doing? SoapBox Dec 2013 #15
LOL, where are the terrorists? Where? In the USA name the last terror attack! They have your ass.... Logical Dec 2013 #22
Because the NSA did such a terrific job stopping the Boston Marathon bombing. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #26
I would point out that the authorities were Diego_Native 2012 Dec 2013 #39
Surveillance is not for prevention, but for prosecution of the perps. merrily Dec 2013 #65
Who put you in charge? You don't care if the NSA listens to your calls? Fine, I DO care. SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #50
.... Phlem Dec 2013 #58
We don't have constitutional rights against Google, Facebook, et al. merrily Dec 2013 #64
Eddie crack code Titonwan Dec 2013 #70
THAT, in a nutshell, is why universal government surveillance is a good thing.... mike_c Dec 2013 #3
Like millions of other Americans you mean. Rather than 'apathetic and blinded by partisanship'?? sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #4
You voiced my feelings perfectly. JEB Dec 2013 #8
+1 cantbeserious Dec 2013 #10
It's not good for people to respect mere anger and alienation. gulliver Dec 2013 #19
It Is Clear To Me That One Has Not Actually Read The Article - Many Of The Questions Are Answered cantbeserious Dec 2013 #20
Concern Troll is concerned. Maedhros Dec 2013 #52
Like I said, anyone who cares about this COUNTRY rather than individual parties, is angry and sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #73
Like maybe Thomas Paine.. the originator of our cherished but shredded Bill of Rights.. eom 2banon Dec 2013 #43
I did not know that. That's ironic, given that he was a relatively recent immigrant merrily Dec 2013 #63
So, It Is Wrong For Americans To Have No Confidence In Oligarchs, Corporations And Government cantbeserious Dec 2013 #9
A Principled Position - From The Article - Greenwald chose a third path. cantbeserious Dec 2013 #16
It is amazing. Snowden -- barely more than a kid with no high school diploma, no college degree, JDPriestly Dec 2013 #48
I find that scary. RC Dec 2013 #72
Thanks. JDPriestly Dec 2013 #77
+1. Agreed nt riderinthestorm Dec 2013 #75
And productive. As opposed to those who are merely angry and alienated. merrily Dec 2013 #69
Shining light on cockroaches. jsr Dec 2013 #5
That's so authoritarian lark Dec 2013 #11
I wasn't referring to Snowden & Greenwald jsr Dec 2013 #24
My bad lark Dec 2013 #76
Your post is K&R n/t deafskeptic Dec 2013 #27
pretty sure the poster did not mean snowden and greenwald. niyad Dec 2013 #37
Now that this is in place, I fear it will only ever expand. Snarkoleptic Dec 2013 #6
that graphic explains it perfectly niyad Dec 2013 #36
True nt Logical Dec 2013 #61
I absolutely LOVE your signature GIF!!! hueymahl Dec 2013 #78
sorry to say I don't recall where I grabbed it. Snarkoleptic Dec 2013 #79
Thank you very much for this article. amerxp Dec 2013 #7
Hi and welcome to DU! lark Dec 2013 #12
Snowden Did Humanity A Favor - History Will Record cantbeserious Dec 2013 #14
+1000! n-t Logical Dec 2013 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2013 #28
welcome to du niyad Dec 2013 #34
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch.....nt Enthusiast Dec 2013 #13
Highly recommend..and thanks. n/t Jefferson23 Dec 2013 #17
But..but..everybody knew about it...that's why our "transparent" gov't was keeping it secret. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #18
Anyone that can read this.. sendero Dec 2013 #23
+1000! n-t Logical Dec 2013 #25
nailed it G_j Dec 2013 #29
The Founding Fathers are overrated Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #55
Yes. sendero Dec 2013 #56
Go back to the founding of this country Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #60
John Adams not only never owned a slave he considered it a great 'evil'. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #74
Have you read the John Adams/Thomas Jefferson correspondence? JDPriestly Dec 2013 #59
kickety countryjake Dec 2013 #30
kick 840high Dec 2013 #32
It's an Excellent read for anyone willing to spend the time. Thanks! nt adirondacker Dec 2013 #31
^ Wilms Dec 2013 #33
k and r, with MANY thanks. niyad Dec 2013 #35
Good read, thanks for sharing! SpcMnky Dec 2013 #38
Lots of quotables from Snowden. ronnie624 Dec 2013 #40
So true. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #41
I wonder if he'll ever specify what lies he's talking about. randome Dec 2013 #42
He didn't say it happened before. ronnie624 Dec 2013 #44
thanks for the link Logical Dec 2013 #46
Excellent article. K&R Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #45
K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2013 #47
k/r marmar Dec 2013 #49
The problem with Snowden and Greenwald goldent Dec 2013 #51
You are wrong. Foreign governments needed to know what we are doing also. We dont trust them and... Logical Dec 2013 #53
"We dont trust them and they should not trust us" goldent Dec 2013 #57
we are all "on the other side" now.... mike_c Dec 2013 #54
They didn't just release "anything and everything". ronnie624 Dec 2013 #62
I think only 1% of the stuff Snowden collected has been released. merrily Dec 2013 #66
And the editor-in-chief of the Guardian said, ronnie624 Dec 2013 #68
Releasing anything and everything? Hissyspit Dec 2013 #71
God, I miss the rule of law. merrily Dec 2013 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rolling Stone: How two al...»Reply #62