Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
16. Less than sixty world wide.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 05:35 AM
Dec 2013

This from the agency that swore for years that it wasn't doing anything like that, and now that they've been caught collecting data on every single cell phone in the nation, swears that nobody is looking at it, or listening to it, or anything like that. Now, we're supposed to believe them when they say less than sixty is all they're monitoring.

Fine if it's less than sixty then lets talk about cutting that budget since you're spending billions of dollars to monitor sixty people that seems wasteful to me. How about we shift 75% of your budget over to taking care of our seniors, and our children, and perhaps finding homes for those homeless?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Snowden stole 'keys to th...»Reply #16