Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

(8,912 posts)
37. Fair enough, but . . .
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 01:50 PM
Dec 2013

. . . what, then, is the justification for collecting and storing the internet activity, the content of electronic communications and telephone metadata for virtually every American, both here and abroad?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No kro32 Dec 2013 #1
sorry, your premise is bogus grasswire Dec 2013 #2
+1 nt markpkessinger Dec 2013 #3
Well with all due respect kro32 Dec 2013 #4
But BellaKos Dec 2013 #7
The best upgrade that could happen randr Dec 2013 #11
They're storing fucking data on Americans. Is that the upgrade we need? Th1onein Dec 2013 #30
'I have no idea how poorly or perfectly their old systems operated.' Rex Dec 2013 #40
+1 and rec merrily Dec 2013 #5
Bogus bogus bogus! Enthusiast Dec 2013 #13
How can you be sure, given that this administration is not transparent, except merrily Dec 2013 #6
Perhaps we should upgrade other things first? n2doc Dec 2013 #8
+1 for exposing the real threats that Americans face everyday. Scuba Dec 2013 #9
Absolutely! infrastructure is a far greater ROI. n/t hootinholler Dec 2013 #14
nice point n/t fishwax Dec 2013 #34
What utter nonsense, do you really think people are going to buy this? If you are concerned about sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #19
Thanks for your words of wisdom Keith LondonReign2 Dec 2013 #25
You don't know Jack. Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #27
And besides all of this doublespeak, what IS that reason? Th1onein Dec 2013 #29
That is not what Alexander said bornskeptic Dec 2013 #10
The truth is that they are tracking everyone. Savannahmann Dec 2013 #15
And one of them was the Boston Bomber, yet with all this money and effort and surveillance, they sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #20
They are building a kind of surveillance time machine KurtNYC Dec 2013 #35
So far the threat from terrorists etal randr Dec 2013 #12
Thank you, I just made the same points above. Children being murdered right here in the US in their sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #21
For what is being spent there should NEVER EVER be a terrorist attack or shooting or bombing or uponit7771 Dec 2013 #16
Except the NSA is for external, not internal, threats. randome Dec 2013 #17
There's been external attack... I have to bring up the B word but it comes to mind... uponit7771 Dec 2013 #18
You mean Boston? But that was an internal threat, not extenal. And the ball was clearly dropped. randome Dec 2013 #22
How many 'terrorists' have they caught as a result of all this surveillance? Feinstein says we are sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #23
Feinstein should keep her mouth shut unless she has facts to back up what she says. randome Dec 2013 #26
Feinstein is in a far better position to know what she is talking about than anyone here on this sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #28
I think most people are upset that it didn't confirm their fears. politichew Dec 2013 #24
Our fears have already been confirmed, kiddo. We're upset about the LIES. Th1onein Dec 2013 #31
Not a kid. nt politichew Dec 2013 #36
Wow! What a fact-filled response to my post! Th1onein Dec 2013 #38
Learn to talk to people with respect and maybe they will humor your paranoia. nt politichew Dec 2013 #39
Yeah, that's the ticket! I see the respect you got in that post, kiddo! Th1onein Dec 2013 #41
To spend a billion dollars plus for a "purported" storage facility - is all the B.S. banter that one laserhaas Dec 2013 #32
You must have watched a different 60 minutes than the one last night ksoze Dec 2013 #33
Fair enough, but . . . markpkessinger Dec 2013 #37
None. There is none. That is why you see all the lame excuses being thrown out there. Rex Dec 2013 #42
US Persons is a subset of People jmowreader Dec 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, if the 60 Minutes seg...»Reply #37