Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
17. You've got to wonder, don't you?
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:53 PM
Dec 2013

I do think it would work well for those in the sex trade.

What the studies have shown so far is that it will work well especially in combination with other preventive measures.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/prevention/research/prep/

But then, condoms work well too, if used consistently.

Truvada provided 44% additional protection:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/iPrExMediaStatement.html

This approach is called pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP; trial findings showed that a once-daily pill containing tenofovir plus emtricitabine (brand name Truvada®) was safe and provided an average of 44 percent (95% CI 15 to 63%) additional protection against HIV infection to men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgendered women who have sex with men, who also received a comprehensive package of prevention services. These services included use of condoms, monthly HIV testing, counseling, and management of other sexually transmitted infections. The level of protection shown varied widely depending on how consistently participants used PrEP. Among those whose data (based on self-reports, bottles dispensed, and pill counts) indicate use on 90 percent or more days, HIV risk was reduced by roughly 73 percent (95% CI 41 to 88%), while among those whose adherence by the same measure was less than 90 percent, HIV risk was reduced by only about 21 percent (95% CI, from a 52% reduction to a 31% increase).


It has been shown to be pretty safe, which is important.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you for this article. Here is more info on the drug, cost ($1200/month, ins may cover) uppityperson Dec 2013 #1
People who are too flaky to have protected sex XemaSab Dec 2013 #2
not necessarily. people may be drunk/high at night, but sober during the day La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #5
Planning to bareback in the first place is flaky XemaSab Dec 2013 #6
no, it may not be. there are multiple reasons why people bareback and its not easily dismisse La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #7
These are all failures of responsibility XemaSab Dec 2013 #8
yes, but nothing to say they won't take medication. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #9
I care enough about gay people to say XemaSab Dec 2013 #11
LOL. so much privilege and so little knowledge. nt La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #15
Same goes for straights and lesbians XemaSab Dec 2013 #16
except it's not the same, since straights dont have the same social stigmas. nt La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #19
As a straight woman, I have more skin in the game than you do XemaSab Dec 2013 #20
this, condoms do suck, its one of the reasons people dont use them loli phabay Dec 2013 #14
You've got to wonder, don't you? Yo_Mama Dec 2013 #17
It will make want to run out and have Gay Sex FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #3
If you believe the stat that PrEP is 99% effective then the word "unprotected" seems misapplied. KurtNYC Dec 2013 #4
It's not Yo_Mama Dec 2013 #18
Because if straights don't get to fuck around they're DAMNED if the gays get to, the selfish little sibelian Dec 2013 #10
If compliance is such an issue, then why not make it in the form of a skin implant? n/t Ian David Dec 2013 #12
Truvada can have quiet few side effects: darkangel218 Dec 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's a Wonder Drug Tha...»Reply #17