General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nitwits & Why Physicians Lose Credibility [View all]Orrex
(67,252 posts)As I mentioned elsewhere, I'm not qualified to analyze your data, but I think I'm equipped to ask a few questions about methodology (some of which you may already have answered in previous posts that I missed):
1. What were the age ranges of the children studied? Were they the same (i.e., all studied from age 6 months to 4 years, etc.), or were they all different ages?
2. How long were the children studied?
3. How did you control for diet during this time? How closely did you monitor food/nutrient intake?
4. How many children were in the control group?
5. How did you control for non-obvious physical causes that might produce neurological effects similar to those posited to be diet-related?
6. Of the children studied, how many demonstrated "improvements" that might have been normal in longitudinal observation? That is, are the improvements within the normal arc of development? How do these compare with the control group?
7. In cases where children showed rapid, dramatic improvement, did the improvement diminish when the nutritional supplement was removed?
I'm not actually asking you to answer these questions, but rather to consider some of the reasonable concerns that might be raised about the methodology used to generate your data, methodology that would have to be reproduced in order to validate your findings via repeated experimentation.