Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In The Philadelphia Inquirer is an 'article' called 'Obamacare: A bad deal for young people' [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)11. Krugman explained
"Wasn't the ACA .... based on a Heritage proposal?"
...the disconnect best, citing what Jonathan Chait calls the "Heritage uncertainty principle":
And heres the thing: Republicans dont want to help the unfortunate. Theyll propound health-care ideas that will, they claim, help those with preexisting conditions and so on but those arent really proposals, theyre diversionary tactics designed to stall real health reform. Chait finds Newt Gingrich more or less explicitly admitting this.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/13/a-health-care-mystery-explained/?_r=0
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/13/a-health-care-mystery-explained/?_r=0
Republican proposals are hypothetical and theoretical BS. They have no intention of doing anything positive. They get credit for pushing things that they don't actually support and would never enact.
It's like Romney's veto of the most significant parts of the MA health care law.
It's like the AEI asshole pushing that Republicans should stand up for the safety net when his actual message is the poor should support destroying it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In The Philadelphia Inquirer is an 'article' called 'Obamacare: A bad deal for young people' [View all]
onehandle
Dec 2013
OP
As I said, it's not, but that's okay. I am not interested in debating the self-evident. nt
Demo_Chris
Dec 2013
#24
Not with a progressive income tax it wouldn't, since older workers are wealthier, and earn more.
Romulox
Dec 2013
#15
That's paying for the subsidy/tax credit side of things. The other larger half...
Demo_Chris
Dec 2013
#27
Was that after Krugman recently explained his support for the Trans Pacific Partnership?
Romulox
Dec 2013
#21
Nonsense. Obamacare ("Romneycare") is *also* from the Heritage Foundation. YOU agree with them. nt
Romulox
Dec 2013
#28
Yes, and almost exactly in the form it was enacted--e.g. no drug reimportation, no public option. nt
Romulox
Dec 2013
#20