Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My problem with Obamacare [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)32. That's
"So we will have a two tiered country
progressive Blue States with SP and regressive Red States without even Medicaid expansion and doing whatever they can to stop the ACA."
...what happens until the Republicans come around. Look at marriage equality.
It took Arizona nearly 20 years to join Medicaid.
<...>
Medicaid got a chilly reception when it launched in January 1966. It was up to the states to decide whether to participate and only six initially signed up: Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania. Twenty-seven followed suit later that year. Across the country, governors weighed the boon of new federal dollars Washington would foot half of Medicaids bill against the drawback of putting state money into a new program.
Nascent Medicaid programs quickly faced threats: Republican legislators in the New York introduced a bill in 1967 calling for the state to live within its means and repeal its Medicaid program.
Doctors, meanwhile, lamented the program's bureaucracy and griped that payments often arrived late. "Doctors' complaints tie up our telephone lines all day, every day," Frederick W. Richmond, chairman of the Citizen's Committee for Medicaid, told the New York Times in 1967. Some pharmacists voted to boycott the program altogether.
Over time, however, the lure of federal dollars proved strong enough to win over resistant states. Eleven joined the program in 1967. Another wave of eight, largely Southern states came on board in 1970. Arizona proved the last holdout, not joining Medicaid until 1982.
<...>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/09/six-governors-say-they-will-opt-out-of-medicaid-how-long-will-they-hold-out/
Medicaid got a chilly reception when it launched in January 1966. It was up to the states to decide whether to participate and only six initially signed up: Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania. Twenty-seven followed suit later that year. Across the country, governors weighed the boon of new federal dollars Washington would foot half of Medicaids bill against the drawback of putting state money into a new program.
Nascent Medicaid programs quickly faced threats: Republican legislators in the New York introduced a bill in 1967 calling for the state to live within its means and repeal its Medicaid program.
Doctors, meanwhile, lamented the program's bureaucracy and griped that payments often arrived late. "Doctors' complaints tie up our telephone lines all day, every day," Frederick W. Richmond, chairman of the Citizen's Committee for Medicaid, told the New York Times in 1967. Some pharmacists voted to boycott the program altogether.
Over time, however, the lure of federal dollars proved strong enough to win over resistant states. Eleven joined the program in 1967. Another wave of eight, largely Southern states came on board in 1970. Arizona proved the last holdout, not joining Medicaid until 1982.
<...>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/09/six-governors-say-they-will-opt-out-of-medicaid-how-long-will-they-hold-out/
Single payer is going to come state by state.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't know how we're going to "improve" the part about Big Insurance grabbing
Doctor_J
Dec 2013
#18
It's really more than 3%, and insurance companies do most of the administrative work and provide
Hoyt
Dec 2013
#80
Sure, there's lots to dislike. Being worse than the status quo isn't one of them.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#7
I'm an advocate of Medicare for All, inluding dental, optical and hearing aids, but ...
Scuba
Dec 2013
#8
Well, when we complain BEFORE it's passed, we're told, "don't complain until you know what it is"
Doctor_J
Dec 2013
#49
The Mandate to BUY Health Insurance from For Profit Corporations will NEVER be repealed,
bvar22
Dec 2013
#53
True that. A different DEM floats the cuts every month or so, invoking the "deficit" lie
Doctor_J
Dec 2013
#62
The Mandate for every American citizen to Buy Health Insurance is already settled LAW,
bvar22
Dec 2013
#60
ACA is mandatory, for-profit health insurance. All progressives know in their heart
Romulox
Dec 2013
#50