Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
7. Thanks, just as I thought. You stated above that HE had been 'snubbed by Time'.
Wed Dec 18, 2013, 03:42 PM
Dec 2013

Which led me to believe HE had been nominated. But it was Snowden who was nominated and as I thought, Greenwald is merely restating his opinion of the Corporate Media and offering his opinion as to why they would not have had the courage to nominate Snowden. Doesn't seem pissed off on his own behalf. That has always been his position on the Corporate Media.

Regarding Time's final choice, I kind of agree with it since this Pope has spoken out against Predatory Capitalism and admonished members of his own Church for their lack of Christian values regarding the poor.

However, if the award is based on who had the most impact on the world, at this point I would have to say Snowden but he was a runner up, so it's fine by me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Awards they couldn’t acce...»Reply #7